Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039168›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2022

Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience for the Use of Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Natalie Strand, Ryan S D'Souza, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Scott Pritzlaff, Dawood Sayed, Nomen Azeem, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alexander Escobar, Mark A Huntoon, Christopher M Lam and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie StrandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-2550
Ryan S D'SouzaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-9837
Jonathan M HagedorniSpine Pain Physicians, Burnsville, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-8166
Scott PritzlaffDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Dawood SayedThe University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Nomen AzeemFlorida Spine & Pain Specialists, Bradenton, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-5976
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Alexander EscobarComprehensive Centers for Pain Management, Toledo, OH, USA.
Mark A HuntoonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Henrico, VA, USA.
Christopher M LamThe University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-6255
Timothy R DeerThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USPain Management Centers Of America · USThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this peripheral nerve stimulation consensus guideline is to add to the current family of consensus practice guidelines and incorporate a systematic review process. The published literature was searched from relevant electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from database inception to March 29, 2021. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies that described peripheral nerve stimulation in patients in terms of clinical outcomes for various pain conditions, physiological mechanism of action, surgical technique, technique of placement, and adverse events. Twenty randomized controlled trials and 33 prospective observational studies were included in the systematic review process. There is Level I evidence supporting the efficacy of PNS for treatment of chronic migraine headaches via occipital nerve stimulation; chronic hemiplegic shoulder pain via stimulation of nerves innervating the trapezius, supraspinatus, and deltoid muscles; failed back surgery syndrome via subcutaneous peripheral field stimulation; and lower extremity neuropathic and lower extremity post-amputation pain. Evidence from current Level I studies combined with newer technologies facilitating less invasive and easier electrode placement make peripheral nerve stimulation an attractive alternative for managing patients with complex pain disorders. Peripheral nerve stimulation should be used judiciously as an adjunct for chronic and acute postoperative pain following adequate patient screening and positive diagnostic nerve block or stimulation trial.

Indexed as

chronic postoperative painlow back painperipheral neuropathypost-amputation pain

Identifiers

PMID36039168
PMCPMC9419727
OpenAlexW4292714580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.