ArticleSurgery open science2022
Lack of immunogenicity of xenogeneic DNA from porcine biomaterials.
Article in Surgery open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- NovoMemHistology and histopathology · 2026Article
- Bottom-up engineering of the nucleus pulposus using a photocrosslinkable decellularized matrix hydrogel attenuates inflammaging and enhances microtissue-mediated regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of a porcine cholecystic extracellular matrix (CECM) membrane for tissue regeneration.BDJ open · 2025Article
- Biocompatibility Evaluation of Porcine-Derived Collagen Sheets for Clinical Applications: In Vitro Cytotoxicity, In Vivo Sensitization, and Intracutaneous Reactivity Studies.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Efficacy of xenogeneic fresh and lyophilized amniotic membranes on the healing of experimentally induced full-thickness skin wounds in dogs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Liver tissue engineering using decellularized scaffolds: Current progress, challenges, and opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Unraveling the Relevance of Tissue-Specific Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels for Vocal Fold Regenerative Biomaterials: A Comprehensive Proteomic and In Vitro Study.Advanced nanobiomed research · 2023Article
- Immunogenicity of decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: a bottleneck in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinically useful biomaterials are derived from xenogeneic extracellular matrices, but extensive processes often used to remove all residual DNA are detrimental to their proper biological function. We hypothesized that deliberate and repeated injection of DNA extracted from clinically implantable, xenogeneic extracellular matrices might elicit an immune response in a well-established murine model that could ultimately lead to altered extracellular matrix remodeling. Methods: DNA was purified from unprocessed porcine extracellular matrices and processed extracellular matrices before sterilization (aseptic) and after sterilization. Groups of 10 mice were injected with these 3 purified DNAs and 3 controls: (1) DNA from Results: The DNA extracted from unprocessed, aseptic, or sterilized porcine extracellular matrices failed to elicit a rejection response, and only with significant, proinflammatory adjuvant activation could such a response be seen. Without the adjuvants, biomaterial-derived DNA resulted in a mild accommodation cytokine response locally and no systemic anti-DNA antibody expression even at doses approximately 100-fold larger than would be clinically likely via extracellular matrix implantation. Conclusion: The immunological safety of porcine extracellular matrix biomaterials appears not to be related to DNA residues present. Such biomaterials need not be extensively processed, likely leading to detrimental changes in their bioactivity, solely in an effort to remove the mammalian DNA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.