ArticleOncology letters2022
Efficacy of a combined tool for stage I non-small cell lung cancer against lymph node metastasis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) based on a combination of morphology using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and metabolism using positron emission tomography (PET)-CT is unknown. The present study evaluated the use of predictive radiological tools, chest CT and PET-CT, for occult LNM in patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. The records of patients who underwent lobectomy between July 2014 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The differences in clinicopathological parameters, including CT and PET, between the LNM and non-LNM groups were assessed. Pure solid tumor was defined as a consolidation-to-tumor ratio of 1. The optimal cut-off value for predictive radiological tools for LNM was assessed according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The present study included 288 patients, of whom 39 (13.5%) had LNM; of these 38 (97.4%) were pure solid type. Larger consolidation size (CS), higher maximal standardized uptake (SUVmax) value and histological type were statistically associated with LNM (all P<0.05). The optimal cutoff values of CS and SUVmax for predicting LNM were 19 mm and 5.5 respectively, as assessed using the area under the ROC curve. The combination of CS ≥19 mm and SUVmax ≥5.5 demonstrated a markedly higher odds ratio (9.184; 95% CI, 4.345-19.407) than each parameter individually. The minimum values of CS and SUVmax associated with LNM were 10 mm and 0.8 respectively. Pure solid formation and CS as morphology and SUVmax as metabolism were useful tools that complemented each other in predicting LNM. The combined method of evaluating SUVmax and CS may identify eligibility for LN dissection. However, considering the minimum values of CS and SUVmax in LNM, it cannot affirm the omission of LN dissection for cases that do not meet the combined criteria using HRCT and PET-CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.