Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038954›Full record

ArticleFamily process2023

Measuring "we-ness" in couple relationships: A social identity approach.

Tegan Cruwys, Erica I South, William Kim Halford, Judith A Murray, Martin P Fladerer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tegan CruwysResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5296-3480
Erica I SouthSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
William Kim HalfordSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9645-9147
Judith A MurraySchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Martin P FladererSchool of Management, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
The University of Queensland · AUAustralian National University · AUTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on couple relationships has increasingly focused on the concept of "we-ness", the subjective closeness of the couple bond, as crucial to predicting relationship outcomes including satisfaction and dissolution. However, diverging perspectives on the definition, terminology, and measurement of this concept persist. We drew upon social identity theorizing to clarify the nature of we-ness and investigate its predictive utility. Participants were 375 members of the general community in long-term intimate relationships. The sample were aged 18-74 (M = 37.22; SD = 12.00) and 69% were women. Participants completed seven measures of we-ness drawn from both the couple literature and the social identity literature. We used exploratory factor analyses to establish the latent structure of we-ness, and regression analyses to examine the utility of each we-ness factor in predicting relationship satisfaction and likelihood of dissolution. A four-factor solution was extracted and the factors were labeled couple identity, partner liking, relationship orientation, and partner similarity. Each of the four factors explained unique variance in relationship quality, with couple identity being most strongly associated with positive outcomes. We conclude that couple research can fruitfully draw upon social identity theorizing in conceptualizing we-ness. This has implications both for more effectively measuring key concepts and for more precisely targeting interventions in couple therapy.

Indexed as

Couples TherapyInterpersonal RelationsEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleSexual PartnersSocial Identificationcouple identitydivorcegroup membershiprelationship qualityrelationship satisfactionseparationwe-ness关系满意度关系质量分居团体成员夫妻认同我们离婚

Identifiers

PMID36038954
PMCPMC10946554
OpenAlexW4293677900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.