Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038952›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Hospital In Home: Evaluating Need and Readiness for Implementation (HENRI) in the Department of Veterans Affairs: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation and participatory implementation planning study.

Jennifer L Sullivan, Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Derek D'Arcy, Adele Levine, Lindsey Zimmerman, Marlena H Shin, Emily Franzosa, William Hung, Orna Intrator

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer L SullivanCenter for Innovation in Long Term Service and Supports, Providence VA Healthcare System, Providence, USA. Jennifer.sullivan@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2906-2232
Reza Yousefi-NooraieDepartment of Public Health Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Derek D'ArcyVA Finger Lakes Healthcare System, Canandaigua, NY, USA.
Adele LevineDepartment of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lindsey ZimmermanOffice of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, National Center for PTSD, Rockville, USA.
Marlena H ShinCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Emily FranzosaGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
William HungGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Orna IntratorDepartment of Public Health Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

Hospital In Home: Evaluating Need and Readiness for Implementation (HENRI)I01HX003277 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF · PI William W.,MPH, MD Hung, ORNA INTRATOR · 2022 to 2026
–
HSRD VA I01 HX003277U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs IIR-21-154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital-In-Home (HIH) program delivers patient-centered, acute-level hospital care at home. Compared to inpatient care, HIH has demonstrated improved patient safety, effectiveness, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. The VA Office of Geriatrics & Extended Care (GEC) has supported the development of 12 HIH program sites nationally, yet adoption in VA remains modest, and questions remain regarding optimal implementation practices to extend reach and adaptability of this innovation. Guided by theoretical and procedural implementation science frameworks, this study aims to systematically gather evidence from the 12 HIH programs and to develop a participatory approach to engage stakeholders, assess readiness, and develop/adapt implementation strategies and evaluation metrics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe propose a multi-phase concurrent triangulation design comprising of (1) qualitative interviews with key informants and document review, (2) quantitative evaluation of effectiveness outcomes, and (3) mixed-methods synthesis and adaptation of a Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM)-guided conceptual framework.

resultsThe prospective phase will involve a participatory process of identifying stakeholders (leadership, HIH staff, veterans, and caregivers), engaging in planning meetings informed by implementation mapping, and developing implementation logic models and blueprints. The process will be assessed using a mixed-methods approach through participant observation and document review. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATION: This study will support the continued spread of HIH programs, generate a catalog of HIH implementation evidence, and create implementation tools and infrastructure for future HIH development. The multi-phase nature of informing prospective planning with retrospective analysis is consistent with the Learning Health System framework.

Indexed as

Home careHospital at HomeInnovationOlder adultsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID36038952
PMCPMC9422109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.