Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038912›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

How to establish workplace learning in long-term care: results from a World Café dialogue.

Merel E A van Lierop, Judith M M Meijers, Erik van Rossum, Johanna E R Rutten, Theresa Thoma-Lürken, Sandra M G Zwakhalen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merel E A van LieropDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands. m.vanlierop@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Judith M M MeijersDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands.
Erik van RossumDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands.
Johanna E R RuttenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands.
Theresa Thoma-LürkenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands.
Sandra M G ZwakhalenDepartment of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 516022520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs long-term care continues to change, the traditional way of learning for work purposes is no longer sufficient. Long-term care organisations need to become 'learning organisations' and facilitate workplace learning for nursing staff teams. Therefore, insight is needed into what conditions are important for establishing workplace learning. The aim and objective of this article is to gain insight into necessary individual, team and organisational conditions for nursing staff to enhance workplace learning in long-term care settings.

methodsThis study is a qualitative explorative study. A World Café method was used to host group dialogues in which participants (n = 42) discussed certain questions. Group dialogues were held for the nursing home and community care setting separately due to organisational differences. Nursing staff, experts in workplace learning, educational staff, client representatives and experts in the field of work and organisation in healthcare organisations were invited to a Dutch long-term care organisation to discuss questions of interest. Data were analysed using theme-based content analysis.

resultsOverall themes concerning individual, team and organisational conditions for workplace learning included: facilitating characteristics (e.g. to be given time and room for [team] development); behavioural characteristics (e.g. an open attitude); context and culture (e.g. feeling safe); cooperation and communication (e.g. giving/receiving feedback); and knowledge and skills (e.g. acquiring knowledge from each other). No major differences were found between settings.

conclusionsBy assessing the themes at the individual, team and organisational level regarding nursing staff, the current workplace learning situation, and its possible improvements, can be detected.

Indexed as

Community careContinuous improvementLearning and improvement climateLong-Term careNursing homesNursing staffWorkplace learning

Identifiers

PMID36038912
PMCPMC9423694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.