ArticleBMC urology2022
Introduction of a modified single stage reconstruction technique of male penopubic epispadias.
Article in BMC urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo represent the long-term outcomes of our modified single-stage technique for the reconstruction of isolated penopubic epispadias in male patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsData from 113 patients were obtained from bladder-exstrophy-epispadias database of our tertiary center. A total of seven boys with isolated penopubic epispadias with no prior history of surgery and any other anomaly underwent our modified surgical approach from February 1997 to September 2019. The mean ± SD age at surgery was 6.5 ± 2.4 years. Volitional voiding status and cosmetic appearance were evaluated at each follow-up interval. Postoperative follow-up was performed at quarterly intervals in the first year and once a year in subsequent years.
resultsThe mean ± SD of follow-up was 8.5 ± 6 years. All boys who were incontinent achieved urinary control and the ability of normal transurethral micturition following the surgery. Four boys became completely dry, and the other three attained social dryness. Postoperative mean (SD) bladder capacity was significantly increased from 54.5 (11) to 124 (40.0) within 6 months, and to 194 (47.5) at 18 months after surgery. Dorsal curvature has been resolved in all cases, and no postoperative complications were noted except for surgical site infection in one patient treated with antibiotics and bilateral vesicourethral reflux resolved after injection of bulking agents. Four patients had normal erectile function and ejaculation, while the others have not reached puberty yet. Moreover, none of the patients developed urethrocutaneous fistula, stricture, or penile ischemia.
conclusionThe present findings suggest the safety and effectiveness of the combination of single-stage urethro-genitoplasty, bladder neck plication, and fat pad pedicled flap in management of boys with isolated penopubic epispadias that can lead to the achievement of urinary control, acceptable sexual function, and cosmetically satisfactory genitalia. Minimal morbidity, low complication rate, and promising outcomes are essential factors, supporting the notion of introducing this technique as a valid option for management of this entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.