ArticleBMC urology2022
Efficacy and safety of surgery in renal carcinoma patients 75 years and older: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Small renal tumors in geriatric patients-surveillance, biopsy, or surgery?]Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Framing Surgical Decisions in Elderly Patients: Minimally Invasive Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma at Mid-Term Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Targeting polyunsaturated fatty acids desaturase FADS1 inhibits renal cancer growth via ATF3-mediated ER stress response.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2025Article
- Targeting Fatty Acid Desaturase I Inhibits Renal Cancer Growth Via ATF3-mediated ER Stress Response.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Prognostic factors of renal cell cancer in elderly patients: a population-based cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy and complications of surgical treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma aged ≥ 75 years.
methodsFrom January 2009 to May 2019, we assessed 166 patients aged 75 years and older, who either had radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) as treatments for diagnosed renal cell carcinoma. Patients were divided into one group of patients aged 75-79 years and the second group of patients ≥ 80 years. The complications and survival were compared between the two groups.
resultsAll 166 patients were successfully operated on. Differences between the two groups were statistically significant in intraoperative and postoperative complications and Clavien-Dindo score of ≥ 1 (P = 0.02, P < 0.001, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed no significant correlation between a Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 1 versus gender, body mass index (BMI), lack of symptoms, KPS, baseline GFR, postoperative GFR, tumor size, tumor location, surgical method, and transfusion or no transfusion (ALL P > 0.05). Multifactor analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, partial nephrectomy, and operation time were independent predictors of a Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 1. No significant difference was found in OS between the two groups, (P < 0.0001), and no significant difference in CSS (P = 0.056). There was no significant difference in OS and CSS between the RN and PN groups (P = 0.143, P = 0.281, respectively).
conclusionsAccording to our findings, the overall safety of surgical therapy for elderly patients with renal cell carcinoma is adequate. PN should be carefully examined, especially over the age of 80. To select suitable patients based on an assessment of the tumor's complexity and patients' physical condition, such as age, underlying diseases and other conditions, technical feasibility, balance of benefits and a case-by-case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.