Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038848›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

Impact of COVID-19 restrictive measures on income and health service utilization of tuberculosis patients in India.

Susmita Chatterjee, Palash Das, Anna Vassall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susmita ChatterjeeGeorge Institute for Global Health, Research Department, 308, Elegance Tower, Plot No 8, Jasola District Centre, 110025, New Delhi, India. schatterjee@georgeinstitue.org.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0937-7205
Palash DasGeorge Institute for Global Health, Research Department, 308, Elegance Tower, Plot No 8, Jasola District Centre, 110025, New Delhi, India.
Anna VassallLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Global Health and Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK.

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/17/1/503339The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance IA/CPHI/17/1/503339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nationwide lockdown (March 25 to June 8, 2020) to curb the spread of coronavirus infection had significant health and economic impacts on the Indian economy. There is limited empirical evidence on how COVID-19 restrictive measures may impact the economic welfare of specific groups of patients, e.g., tuberculosis patients. We provide the first such evidence for India.

methodsA total of 291 tuberculosis patients from the general population and from a high-risk group, patients from tea garden areas, were interviewed at different time points to understand household income loss during the complete lockdown, three and eight months after the complete lockdown was lifted. Income loss was estimated by comparing net monthly household income during and after lockdown with prelockdown income. Tuberculosis service utilization patterns before and during the lockdown period also were examined. Household income loss, travel and other expenses related to tuberculosis drug pickup were presented in 2020 US dollars (1 US$ = INR 74.132).

results26% of households with tuberculosis patients in tea garden areas and 51% of households in the general population had zero monthly income during the complete lockdown months (April-May 2020). Overall income loss slowly recovered during July-August compared to April-May 2020. Approximately 7% of patients in the general population and 4% in tea garden areas discontinued their tuberculosis medicines because of the complete lockdown.

conclusionDiscontinuation of medicine will have an additional burden on the tuberculosis elimination program in terms of additional cases, including multidrug resistant tuberculosis cases. Income loss for households and poor restoration of income after the lockdown will likely have an impact on the nutrition of tuberculosis patients and families. Tuberculosis patients working in the informal sector were the worst affected group during the nationwide lockdown. This emphasizes that a policy priority must continue to protect those working in informal sectors from the economic consequences of such restrictive measures, including paid sick leave, additional food support, and direct benefit transfers. Alongside ensuring widespread access to COVID-19 vaccines, these policy actions remain pivotal in ensuring the well-being of those who are unfortunate enough to be living with tuberculosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19TuberculosisCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19 VaccinesHealth ServicesHumansIncomeIndiaTeaCOVID-19 VaccinesTeaCOVID-19Economic impactEmploymentFinancial ImpactIncome lossIndiaInformal sectorTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36038848
PMCPMC9421110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.