Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038814›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2023

Stimulus whitening improves the efficiency of reverse correlation.

Alexis Compton, Benjamin W Roop, Benjamin Parrell, Adam C Lammert

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reverse Correlation Uncovers More Complete Tinnitus Spectra.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis ComptonBiomedical Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Rd, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA.
Benjamin W RoopProgram of Neuroscience, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Benjamin ParrellDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Adam C LammertBiomedical Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Rd, Worcester, MA, 01609, USA. alammert@wpi.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human perception depends upon internal representations of the environment that help to organize the raw information available from the senses by acting as reference patterns. Internal representations are widely characterized using reverse correlation, a method capable of producing unconstrained estimates of the representation itself, all on the basis of simple responses to random stimuli. Despite its advantages, reverse correlation is often infeasible to apply because of its inefficiency-a very large number of stimulus-response trials are required in order to obtain an accurate estimate. Here, we show that an important source of this inefficiency is small, yet nontrivial, correlations that occur by chance between randomly generated stimuli. We demonstrate in simulation that whitening stimuli to remove such correlations before eliciting responses provides greater than 85% improvement in efficiency for a given estimation quality, as well as a two- to fivefold increase in quality for a given sample size. Moreover, unlike conventional approaches, whitening improves the efficiency of reverse correlation without introducing bias into the estimate, or requiring prior knowledge of the target internal representation. Improving the efficiency of reverse correlation with whitening may enable a broader scope of investigations into the individual variability and potential universality of perceptual mechanisms.

Indexed as

Classification imagesPerceptual representationsReceptive fieldsReverse correlationWhitening

Identifiers

PMID36038814
PMCPMC10556169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.