ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Prostate and breast cancer: similarities and differences].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate and breast carcinomas are amongst the most common new diseases in men and women, with steadily rising incidences. In addition to the significant health consequences, both diseases also lead to a significantly reduced quality of life due to their influence on sexual function. The aim of this work is to identify scientific approaches and research priorities that in the future might lead to synergies in both disciplines by specifically considering the similarities and differences between the two diseases. For this purpose, clinically relevant aspects such as risk factors, treatment options, as well as scientific similarities and differences that offer direct joint research approaches in the areas of cultivation and modeling of both tumor entities were analyzed. Through this approach, we were able to demonstrate that due to the comparable biology of the two diseases and the underlying mechanisms, scientific synergies may certainly lead to targeted research. Clinical similarities also indicate that close collaboration between the two disciplines could lead to improved treatment of our patients. Evidence deficiencies in both diseases (e.g. the metastasis mechanisms of both tumor entities) and controversially discussed aspects such as risk factors clearly show that further scientific projects for a more detailed understanding of both diseases are necessary to ensure future success in the treatment of our patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36038785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.