Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038754›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022

Progress in bioleaching: part B, applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries.

Francisco F Roberto, Axel Schippers

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Do ferrous iron-oxidizing acidophiles (Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Goethite dissolution by acidophilic bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francisco F RobertoTechnical Services Processing and Metallurgy, Newmont Corporation, Englewood, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5459-0892
Axel SchippersFederal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR), Geomicrobiology Unit, Resource Geochemistry, Stilleweg 2 30655, Hannover, Germany. axel.schippers@bgr.de.
Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources · DENewmont Mining (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an update to the last mini-review with the same title pertaining to recent developments in bioleaching and biooxidation published in 2013 (Brierley and Brierley). In the intervening almost 10 years, microbial processes for sulfide minerals have seen increased acceptance and ongoing but also declining commercial application in copper, gold, nickel and cobalt production. These processes have been applied to heap and tank leaching, nowadays termed biomining, but increasing concerns about the social acceptance of mining has also seen the re-emergence of in situ leaching and quest for broader applicability beyond uranium and copper. Besides metal sulfide oxidation, mineral dissolution via reductive microbial activities has seen experimental application to laterite minerals. And as resources decline or costs for their exploitation rise, mine waste rock and tailings have become more attractive to consider as easily accessible resources. As an advantage, they have already been removed from the ground and in some cases contain ore grades exceeding that of those currently being mined. These factors promote concepts of circular economy and efficient use and valorization of waste materials. KEY POINTS: • Bioleaching of copper sulfide ore deposits is producing less copper today • Biooxidation of refractory gold ores is producing more gold than in the past • Available data suggest bioleaching and biooxidation processes reduce carbon emissions.

Indexed as

CopperMiningGoldMineralsSulfidesCopperGoldMineralsSulfidesBioleachingBiominingBiooxidationCobaltCopperIn situ leachingLateriteNickelReductive bioleaching

Identifiers

PMID36038754
PMCPMC9424069
OpenAlexW4293678579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.