Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038733›Full record

SynthesisDysphagia2023

Esophageal Stents for the Management of Benign Esophageal Strictures in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

Mohammad Hassan Sohouli, Hosein Alimadadi, Pejman Rohani, Felipe L Athayde, Kássio S Cunha, Heitor O Santos

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Hassan SohouliDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Pediatrics Centre of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hosein AlimadadiDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Pediatrics Centre of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pejman RohaniDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Pediatrics Centre of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rohanipejmanmd@gmail.com.
Felipe L AthaydeSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Kássio S CunhaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Heitor O SantosSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Children's Medical Center · IRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of esophageal stents for the management of esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. A systematic review was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of esophageal stents for the management of benign esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. Observational studies related to the examination of esophageal stents in pediatrics were extracted using the original databases by December 2021. We found 18 retrospective and prospective studies with a total of 340 children and adolescents. Overall, our findings show that different therapeutic modalities based on esophageal stents were offered to children and adolescents for various indications, in which most studies reported successful cases, although ineffective claims cannot be ignored. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent, self-expandable metal stent, and silastic esophageal stent were the stent types most used, although different materials and prototypes were reported as well. The number of stents used per patient and the duration of the stenting therapy varied widely (ranging from 1 to 584 days). Such treatments were not standardized because of different factors, such as different tolerance to complications in subjects aged 1 month and 16 years, frequent stent migration requiring removal followed or not by its replacement, different guides provided by each stent manufacturer, and successful healing of esophageal lesions. Different esophageal stents may be a reasonable therapeutic approach for the management of benign esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. We believe that esophagus-sparing methods like stents represent a promising alternative or adjunctive treatment to be considered in pediatrics.

Indexed as

Esophageal DiseasesEsophageal StenosisAdolescentChildConstriction, PathologicHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeBenign esophageal stricturesEsophageal stentFully covered self-expandable metal stentSelf-expandable metal stentSilastic esophageal stent

Identifiers

PMID36038733
OpenAlexW4293680138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.