ArticleEye (London, England)2023
Prevalence of asteroid hyalosis and systemic risk factors in United States adults.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined TyG index and systemic inflammation indices as predictors for asteroid hyalosis: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Asteroid Hyalosis: An Update on Prevalence, Risk Factors, Emerging Clinical Impact and Management Strategies.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveAsteroid hyalosis (AH) is an uncommon clinical entity of unknown aetiology that is associated with older age. Previous epidemiologic studies have reported various systemic and demographic risk factors for AH but remain limited due to regional constraints of their study populations. Additionally, Hispanic and Non-Hispanic black populations remain under sampled. The aim of this study is to examine the prevalence of asteroid hyalosis in the United States and identify associated factors at a national level. SUBJECTS/
methodsThis is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 5578 subjects aged 40 and older from the 2005 to 2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The primary outcome measured was asteroid hyalosis on retinal imaging in any eye. Evaluated risk factors included patient demographics, medical history, body measures, serum markers, and fundus photography findings.
resultsPrevalence of asteroid hyalosis was 0.86% overall, 0.86% in Caucasians, 0.79% in African-Americans, and 0.88% in Hispanics. Asteroid hyalosis was associated with older age (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.12; odds ratio [OR], 1.09) but not ethnicity or sex. After adjusting for age, greater bodyweight (p = 0.049; 95% CI, 0.001-0.04; OR, 1.02), and history of myocardial infarction (p = 0.022; 95% CI, 0.07-1.55; OR, 2.36) were also found to be significant risk factors.
conclusionAsteroid hyalosis is a rare entity in the US associated with older age, greater body weight, and prior history of MI. A potential relationship between AH and cardiovascular disease remains plausible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.