Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038644›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Quantitative MRI of chronic pancreatitis: results from a multi-institutional prospective study, magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive method for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis (MINIMAP).

Temel Tirkes, Dhiraj Yadav, Darwin L Conwell, Paul R Territo, Xuandong Zhao, Scott A Persohn, Anil K Dasyam, Zarine K Shah, Sudhakar K Venkatesh, Naoki Takahashi and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03099850 (Prospective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for Epidemiologic and Translational Studies - PROCEED Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03099850 recruitingnot on this map

Prospective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for Epidemiologic and Translational Studies - PROCEED Study

TypeobservationalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2017 to 2030Enrolled2,345ConditionsPancreatitisArmsData Management and Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. T1 Mapping of the Abdomen, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Intrapancreatic fat, pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Temel TirkesDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, 550 N. University Blvd. Suite 0663, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. atirkes@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0185-8741
Dhiraj YadavDepartment of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Darwin L ConwellDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Paul R TerritoDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Stark Neurosciences Research Institute Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Xuandong ZhaoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Scott A PersohnStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Anil K DasyamDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Zarine K ShahDepartment of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sudhakar K VenkateshDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Naoki TakahashiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashley WachsmanDepartment of Radiology Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California in Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Liang LiDepartment of Biostatistics Director, Quantitative Science Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Stephen J PandolDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Walter G ParkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Santhi S VegeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Phil A HartDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mark TopazianMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dana K AndersenDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Evan L FogelLehman, Bucksot and Sherman Section of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, Pancreatic Cancer (CPDPC)

Funding

Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreatic Cancer: Coordinating and Data Management Center (CSCPDPC-CDMC)U01DK108328 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Liang Li, Suyu Liu · 2015 to 2026
$32.8M
Indiana University (IU) Clinical Center for Chronic Pancreatitis Clinical Research NetworkU01DK108323 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Jeffrey James Easler, Evan L Fogel · 2015 to 2026
$6.5M
UPMC Clinical Center for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis and DiabetesU01DK108306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Frederico G. S. Toledo, Dhiraj Yadav · 2015 to 2026
$6.4M
The Stanford Clinical Center for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic CancerU01DK108300 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Sohail Z Husain, Walter Gwang-Up Park · 2015 to 2026
$6.3M
The Exocrine and Endocrine Pancreas in Type 2 Diabetes, Pancreatitis and Cancer (Admin Supplement)U01DK108288 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Santhi Swaroop Vege · 2015 to 2026
$5.9M
The Ohio State University Pancreatic Disorders Network (OSU-PDN)U01DK108327 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONWELL, DARWIN LEWIS, HART, PHILIP A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.5M
Magnetic resonance Imaging as a Non-Invasive Method for Assessment of Pancreatic fibrosis (MINIMAP): a pilot studyR01DK116963 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI FOGEL, EVAN L, TIRKES, TEMEL · 2018 to 2020
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116963NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108288NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108300NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108306NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108323NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108327NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if quantitative MRI techniques can be helpful to evaluate chronic pancreatitis (CP) in a setting of multi-institutional study.

methodsThis study included a subgroup of participants (n = 101) enrolled in the Prospective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for Epidemiologic and Translational Studies (PROCEED) study (NCT03099850) from February 2019 to May 2021. MRI was performed on 1.5 T using Siemens and GE scanners at seven clinical centers across the USA. Quantitative MRI parameters of the pancreas included T1 relaxation time, extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fat signal fraction. We report the diagnostic performance and mean values within the control (n = 50) and CP (n = 51) groups. The T1, ECV and fat signal fraction were combined to generate the quantitative MRI score (Q-MRI).

resultsThere was significantly higher T1 relaxation time; mean 669 ms (± 171) vs. 593 ms (± 82) (p = 0.006), ECV fraction; 40.2% (± 14.7) vs. 30.3% (± 11.9) (p < 0.001), and pancreatic fat signal fraction; 12.2% (± 5.5) vs. 8.2% (± 4.4) (p < 0.001) in the CP group compared to controls. The ADC was similar between groups (p = 0.45). The AUCs for the T1, ECV, and pancreatic fat signal fraction were 0.62, 0.72, and 0.73, respectively. The composite Q-MRI score improved the diagnostic performance (cross-validated AUC: 0.76).

conclusionQuantitative MR parameters evaluating the pancreatic parenchyma (T1, ECV fraction, and fat signal fraction) are helpful in the diagnosis of CP. A Q-MRI score that combines these three MR parameters improves diagnostic performance. Further studies are warranted with larger study populations including patients with acute and recurrent acute pancreatitis and longitudinal follow-ups.

Indexed as

Digestive System AbnormalitiesPancreatitis, ChronicAcute DiseaseFibrosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesChronic pancreatitisExtracellular volume fractionFat signal fractionT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID36038644
PMCPMC9423890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.