Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038627›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival in patients with de novo metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Mao-Shan Chen, Peng-Cheng Liu, Jin-Zhi Yi, Li Xu, Tao He, Hao Wu, Ji-Qiao Yang, Qing Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mao-Shan Chen *Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Peng-Cheng Liu *Department of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Zhi YiDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Li XuDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Tao HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Hao WuDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Ji-Qiao YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China. jqyang@scu.edu.cn.
Qing LvDepartment of Breast Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Street, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China. lvqingwestchina@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. Individualized survival prediction tool is useful for this population. We constructed the predicted nomograms for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) using the data identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The Concordance index (C-index), the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration curves were used for the discrimination and calibration of the nomograms in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. 1962 mTNBC patients with a median follow-up was 13 months (interquartile range, 6-22 months), 1639 (83.54%) cases died of any cause, and 1469 (74.87%) died of breast cancer. Nine and ten independent prognostic factors for BCSS and OS were identified and integrated to construct the nomograms, respectively. The C-indexes of the nomogram for BCSS and OS were 0.694 (95% CI 0.676-0.712) and 0.699 (95% CI 0.679-0.715) in the training cohort, and 0.699 (95% CI 0.686-0.712) and 0.697 (95% CI 0.679-0.715) in the validation cohort, respectively. The AUC values of the nomograms to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year BCSS and OS indicated good specificity and sensitivity in internal and external validation. The calibration curves showed a favorable consistency between the actual and the predicted survival in the training and validation cohorts. These nomograms based on clinicopathological factors and treatment could reliably predict the survival of mTNBC patient. This may be a useful tool for individualized healthcare decision-making.

Indexed as

NomogramsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSEER Program

Identifiers

PMID36038627
PMCPMC9424305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.