Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038616›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2022

Safety analyses from the phase 3 ASCENT trial of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Hope S Rugo, Sara M Tolaney, Delphine Loirat, Kevin Punie, Aditya Bardia, Sara A Hurvitz, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Javier Cortés, Véronique Diéras, Lisa A Carey and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 69 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Sacituzumab govitecan in HRNature medicine · 2024
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A modular framework for antibody-drug conjugate biomarkers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  15. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis in sacituzumab govitecan-treated mTNBC: real-world evidence from a multinational CEBCC-102 cohort.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  16. Netupitant versus aprepitant: model-predicted neurokinin-1 receptor occupancy and implications for long-delayed nausea and vomiting prevention.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Clinical Implications ofPharmaceutics · 2026
    Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 5 countries.

Hope S RugoDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA. Hope.Rugo@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-4814
Sara M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Delphine LoiratDepartment of Medical Oncology and D3i, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Kevin PunieDepartment of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-7963
Aditya BardiaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-1157
Sara A HurvitzMedical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-7191
Joyce O'ShaughnessyBaylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
Javier CortésInternational Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quiron Group, Madrid & Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-1583
Véronique DiérasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-4738
Lisa A CareyDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-4649
Luca GianniGianni Bonadonna Foundation, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2372-9625
Martine J PiccartMedical Oncology, Institute Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.
Sibylle LoiblDepartment of Medicine and Research, Hämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis am Bethanien-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany.
David M GoldenbergDepartment of Clinical Development, Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
Quan HongDepartment of Clinical Development, Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
Martin OlivoDepartment of Clinical Development, Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
Loretta M ItriDepartment of Clinical Development, Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, NJ, USA.
Kevin KalinskyColumbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Immunomedics (United States) · USCentre Eugène Marquis · FRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEmory University · USHarvard University · USInstitut Curie · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEKrankenhaus Bethanien · DEKU Leuven · BETexas Oncology · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an anti-Trop-2 antibody-drug conjugate with an SN-38 payload. In the ASCENT study, patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) relapsed/refractory to ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens (≥1 in the metastatic setting), received SG or single-agent treatment of physician's choice (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). This ASCENT safety analysis includes the impact of age and UGT1A1 polymorphisms, which hinder SN-38 detoxification. SG demonstrated a manageable safety profile in patients with mTNBC, including those ≥65 years; neutropenia/diarrhea are key adverse events (AE). Patients with UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype versus those with 1/*28 and *1/*1 genotypes had higher rates of grade ≥3 SG-related neutropenia (59% vs 47% and 53%), febrile neutropenia (18% vs 5% and 3%), anemia (15% vs 6% and 4%), and diarrhea (15% vs 9% and 10%), respectively. Individuals with UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype should be monitored closely; active monitoring and routine AE management allow optimal therapeutic exposure of SG.

Identifiers

PMID36038616
PMCPMC9424318
OpenAlexW4293435890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.