Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038550›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Cytoplasmic forces functionally reorganize nuclear condensates in oocytes.

Adel Al Jord, Gaëlle Letort, Soline Chanet, Feng-Ching Tsai, Christophe Antoniewski, Adrien Eichmuller, Christelle Da Silva, Jean-René Huynh, Nir S Gov, Raphaël Voituriez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. From Cytoskeletal Remodeling to Oocyte Quality: The Emerging Role of Mechanics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mechanobiology of the Nucleolus.Biology of the cell · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Reorganizing chromatin by cellular deformation.Current opinion in cell biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adel Al JordCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France. adel.aljord@college-de-france.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-3014
Gaëlle LetortCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.
Soline ChanetCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-9411
Feng-Ching TsaiLaboratoire Physico Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, CNRS, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6869-5254
Christophe AntoniewskiARTbio Bioinformatics Analysis Facility, IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Institut Français de Bioinformatique, Paris, France.
Adrien EichmullerCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.
Christelle Da SilvaCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2248-0474
Jean-René HuynhCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4078-399X
Nir S GovDepartment of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7774-1139
Raphaël VoituriezUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie-UPMC, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Marie-Émilie TerretCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-925X
Marie-Hélène VerlhacCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8377-9010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells remodel their cytoplasm with force-generating cytoskeletal motors. Their activity generates random forces that stir the cytoplasm, agitating and displacing membrane-bound organelles like the nucleus in somatic and germ cells. These forces are transmitted inside the nucleus, yet their consequences on liquid-like biomolecular condensates residing in the nucleus remain unexplored. Here, we probe experimentally and computationally diverse nuclear condensates, that include nuclear speckles, Cajal bodies, and nucleoli, during cytoplasmic remodeling of female germ cells named oocytes. We discover that growing mammalian oocytes deploy cytoplasmic forces to timely impose multiscale reorganization of nuclear condensates for the success of meiotic divisions. These cytoplasmic forces accelerate nuclear condensate collision-coalescence and molecular kinetics within condensates. Disrupting the forces decelerates nuclear condensate reorganization on both scales, which correlates with compromised condensate-associated mRNA processing and hindered oocyte divisions that drive female fertility. We establish that cytoplasmic forces can reorganize nuclear condensates in an evolutionary conserved fashion in insects. Our work implies that cells evolved a mechanism, based on cytoplasmic force tuning, to functionally regulate a broad range of nuclear condensates across scales. This finding opens new perspectives when studying condensate-associated pathologies like cancer, neurodegeneration and viral infections.

Indexed as

Cell NucleolusCell NucleusAnimalsCoiled BodiesCytoplasmFemaleMammalsOocytes

Identifiers

PMID36038550
PMCPMC9424315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.