Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038542›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

The automated Galaxy-SynBioCAD pipeline for synthetic biology design and engineering.

Joan Hérisson, Thomas Duigou, Melchior du Lac, Kenza Bazi-Kabbaj, Mahnaz Sabeti Azad, Gizem Buldum, Olivier Telle, Yorgo El Moubayed, Pablo Carbonell, Neil Swainston and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Joan Hérisson *Genomics Metabolics, Genoscope, François Jacob Institute, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, 91057, Evry, France.
Thomas Duigou *Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2649-2950
Melchior du LacUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Kenza Bazi-KabbajUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Mahnaz Sabeti AzadUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Gizem BuldumImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Olivier TelleUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Yorgo El MoubayedUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Pablo CarbonellManchester Institute of Biotechnology, SYNBIOCHEM center, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0993-5625
Neil SwainstonManchester Institute of Biotechnology, SYNBIOCHEM center, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
Valentin ZulkowerEdinburgh Genome Foundry, SynthSys, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH93BF, Edinburgh, UK.
Manish KushwahaUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78352, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8850-3272
Geoff S BaldwinImperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-023X
Jean-Loup FaulonGenomics Metabolics, Genoscope, François Jacob Institute, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, 91057, Evry, France. Jean-Loup.Faulon@inrae.fr.
AgroParisTech · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRImperial College London · GBEdinburgh College · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M00029X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M0101804/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017702/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M018040/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M025640/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M025659/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S004955/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we introduce the Galaxy-SynBioCAD portal, a toolshed for synthetic biology, metabolic engineering, and industrial biotechnology. The tools and workflows currently shared on the portal enables one to build libraries of strains producing desired chemical targets covering an end-to-end metabolic pathway design and engineering process from the selection of strains and targets, the design of DNA parts to be assembled, to the generation of scripts driving liquid handlers for plasmid assembly and strain transformations. Standard formats like SBML and SBOL are used throughout to enforce the compatibility of the tools. In a study carried out at four different sites, we illustrate the link between pathway design and engineering with the building of a library of E. coli lycopene-producing strains. We also benchmark our workflows on literature and expert validated pathways. Overall, we find an 83% success rate in retrieving the validated pathways among the top 10 pathways generated by the workflows.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliSynthetic BiologyBiotechnologyMetabolic EngineeringSoftware

Identifiers

PMID36038542
PMCPMC9424320
OpenAlexW4293503763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.