ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2022
Constructing custom-made radiotranscriptomic signatures of vascular inflammation from routine CT angiograms: a prospective outcomes validation study in COVID-19.
Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computed tomography-based radiomics improves non-invasive diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in non-HIV patients: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Trial
- Pericoronary adipose tissue imaging: quantitative assessment, artificial intelligence integration, and therapeutic modulation.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Early Prediction of Heart Failure From Routine Cardiac CT Using Radiomic Phenotyping of Epicardial Fat.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Pericoronary Radiomics Signature for Non-Culprit Lesion Progression and Revascularization Decision in NSTE-ACS.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Arterial inflammation after myocardial infarction: regulating the immune system.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Lipoprotein(a) and Vascular Redox State in Patients With Advanced Coronary Atherosclerosis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Article
- Distinct visual biases affect humans and artificial intelligence in medical imaging diagnoses.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- A model including CD15, ACE2 and age efficiently predicts COVID-19 severity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in breast cancer after radiotherapy.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Phenotyping atherosclerotic plaque and perivascular adipose tissue: signalling pathways and clinical biomarkers in atherosclerosis.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Advancing cardiovascular risk assessment.Cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Article
- Using artificial intelligence to study atherosclerosis from computed tomography imaging: A state-of-the-art review of the current literature.Atherosclerosis · 2024Review
- Digital health innovation and artificial intelligence in cardiovascular care: a case-based review.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Review
- The complexity of cardiovascular long COVID: where we are.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Transforming Cardiovascular Care With Artificial Intelligence: From Discovery to Practice: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Review
- Advances in Clinical Imaging of Vascular Inflammation: A State-of-the-Art Review.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2024Review
- Assessing the Impact of Long-Term High-Dose Statin Treatment on Pericoronary Inflammation and Plaque Distribution-A Comprehensive Coronary CTA Follow-Up Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Observational
- Initial experience with radiomics of carotid perivascular adipose tissue in identifying symptomatic plaque.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven radiomics: developing valuable radiomics signatures with the use of artificial intelligence.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDirect evaluation of vascular inflammation in patients with COVID-19 would facilitate more efficient trials of new treatments and identify patients at risk of long-term complications who might respond to treatment. We aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image analysis platform that quantifies cytokine-driven vascular inflammation from routine CT angiograms, and sought to validate its prognostic value in COVID-19.
methodsFor this prospective outcomes validation study, we developed a radiotranscriptomic platform that uses RNA sequencing data from human internal mammary artery biopsies to develop novel radiomic signatures of vascular inflammation from CT angiography images. We then used this platform to train a radiotranscriptomic signature (C19-RS), derived from the perivascular space around the aorta and the internal mammary artery, to best describe cytokine-driven vascular inflammation. The prognostic value of C19-RS was validated externally in 435 patients (331 from study arm 3 and 104 from study arm 4) admitted to hospital with or without COVID-19, undergoing clinically indicated pulmonary CT angiography, in three UK National Health Service (NHS) trusts (Oxford, Leicester, and Bath). We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of C19-RS for death in hospital due to COVID-19, did sensitivity analyses based on dexamethasone treatment, and investigated the correlation of C19-RS with systemic transcriptomic changes.
findingsPatients with COVID-19 had higher C19-RS than those without (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2·97 [95% CI 1·43-6·27], p=0·0038), and those infected with the B.1.1.7 (alpha) SARS-CoV-2 variant had higher C19-RS values than those infected with the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 variant (adjusted OR 1·89 [95% CI 1·17-3·20] per SD, p=0·012). C19-RS had prognostic value for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 in two testing cohorts (high [≥6·99] vs low [<6·99] C19-RS; hazard ratio [HR] 3·31 [95% CI 1·49-7·33], p=0·0033; and 2·58 [1·10-6·05], p=0·028), adjusted for clinical factors, biochemical biomarkers of inflammation and myocardial injury, and technical parameters. The adjusted HR for in-hospital mortality was 8·24 (95% CI 2·16-31·36, p=0·0019) in patients who received no dexamethasone treatment, but 2·27 (0·69-7·55, p=0·18) in those who received dexamethasone after the scan, suggesting that vascular inflammation might have been a therapeutic target of dexamethasone in COVID-19. Finally, C19-RS was strongly associated (r=0·61, p=0·00031) with a whole blood transcriptional module representing dysregulation of coagulation and platelet aggregation pathways.
interpretationRadiotranscriptomic analysis of CT angiography scans introduces a potentially powerful new platform for the development of non-invasive imaging biomarkers. Application of this platform in routine CT pulmonary angiography scans done in patients with COVID-19 produced the radiotranscriptomic signature C19-RS, a marker of cytokine-driven inflammation driving systemic activation of coagulation and responsible for adverse clinical outcomes, which predicts in-hospital mortality and might allow targeted therapy.
fundingEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Oxford BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Innovate UK, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, Onassis Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.