Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038179›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Safer Baby Bundle: study protocol for the economic evaluation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce stillbirths.

Emily Joy Callander, Christine Andrews, Kirstine Sketcher-Baker, Michael Christopher Nicholl, Tanya Farrell, Shae Karger, Vicki Flenady

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily Joy CallanderMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia emily.callander@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-6804
Christine AndrewsCentre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Kirstine Sketcher-BakerClinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michael Christopher NichollHealth and Social Policy Branch, New South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Tanya FarrellSafer Care Victoria, Victorian Government, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shae KargerMonash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7100-379X
Vicki FlenadyMater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStillbirth continues to be a public health concern in high-income countries, and with mixed results from several stillbirth prevention interventions worldwide the need for an effective prevention method is ever present. The Safer Baby Bundle (SBB) proposes five evidence-based care packages shown to reduce stillbirth when implemented individually, and therefore are anticipated to produce significantly better outcomes if grouped together. This protocol describes the planned economic evaluation of the SBB quality improvement initiative in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The implementation of the SBB will occur over three state-based health jurisdictions in Australia-New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria, from July 2019 onwards. The intervention is being applied at the state level, with sites opting to participate or not, and no individual woman recruitment. The economic evaluation will be based on a whole-of-population linked administrative dataset, which will include the data of all mothers, and their resultant children, who gave birth between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2023 in these states, covering the preimplementation and postimplementation time period. The primary health outcome for this economic evaluation is late gestation stillbirths, with the secondary outcomes including but not limited to neonatal death, gestation at birth, mode of birth, admission to special care nursery and neonatal intensive care unit, and physical and mental health conditions for mother and child. Costs associated with all healthcare use from birth to 5 years post partum will be included for all women and children. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be undertaken using a difference-in-difference analysis approach to compare the primary outcome (late gestation stillbirth) and total costs for women before and after the implementation of the bundle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the SBB project was provided by the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: HREC/2019/QRBW/47709). Approval for the extraction of data to be used for the economic evaluation was granted by the New South Wales Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 2020/ETH00684/2020.11), Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number: EO2020/4/1167), and Public Health Approval (approval number: PHA 20.00684) was also granted. Dissemination will occur via publication in peer reviewed journals, presentation at clinical and policy-focused conferences and meetings, and through the authors' clinical and policy networks.This study will provide evidence around the cost effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative to prevent stillbirth, identifying the impact on health service use during pregnancy and long-term health service use of children.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementStillbirthChildCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyVictoriaFetal medicineGYNAECOLOGYHEALTH ECONOMICSMaternal medicinePUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36038179
PMCPMC9438048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.