Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038111›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2023

Dualistic classification of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma has its root in spatial heterogeneity.

Tingting Sun, Zuwei Zhang, Liming Tian, Yu Zheng, Linxiang Wu, Yunyun Guo, Xiaohui Li, Yuanyuan Li, Hongwei Shen, Yingrong Lai and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Overview of Tumor Heterogeneity in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tingting SunDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Zuwei ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Liming TianDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Yu ZhengDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Linxiang WuDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Yunyun GuoDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohui LiDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Yuanyuan LiDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Hongwei ShenDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Yingrong LaiDepartment of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Junfeng LiuDepartment of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Huanhuan CuiDepartment of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, 518005 Shenzhen, China; Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, 518005 Shenzhen, China.
Shasha HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Yufeng RenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China.
Guofen YangDepartment of Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen University First Affiliated Hospital, No.58, Zhong Shan Ⅱ Road, 510080 Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: yangguof@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWidespread intra-peritoneal metastases is a main feature of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). Recently, the extent of tumour heterogeneity was used to evaluate the cancer genomes among multi-regions in HGSOC. However, there is no consensus on the effect of tumour heterogeneity on the evolution of the tumour metastasis process in HGSOC.

objectivesWe performed whole-exome sequencing in multiple regions of matched primary and metastatic HGSOC specimens to reveal the genetic mechanisms of ovarian tumourigenesis and malignant progression.

methods63 samples (including ovarian carcinoma, omentum metastasis, and normal tissues) were used. We analyzed the genomic heterogeneity, traced the subclone dissemination and establishment history and compared the different genetic characters of cancer evolutionary models in HGSOC.

resultsWe found that HGSOC had substantial intra-tumour heterogeneity (median 54.2, range 0 ∼ 106.7), high inter-patient heterogeneity (P < 0.001), but relatively limited intra-patient heterogeneity (P = 0.949). Two COSMIC mutational signatures were identified in HGSOCs: signature 3 was related to homologous recombination, and signature 1 was associated with aging. Two scenarios were identified by phylogenetic reconstruction in our study: 3 cases (33.3 %) showed star topology, and the other 6 cases (66.7 %) displayed tree topology. Compared with star topology group, more driver events were identified in tree topology group (P < 0.001), and occurred more frequently in early stage than in late stage of clonal evolution (P < 0.001). Moreover, compared with the star topology group, the tree topology group showed higher rate of intra-tumour heterogeneity (P = 0.045).

conclusionA dualistic classification model was proposed for the classification of HGSOC based on spatial heterogeneity, which may contribute to better managing patients and providing individual treatment for HGSOC patients.

Indexed as

CarcinomaOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansMutationPhylogenyDualistic classificationHigh grade serous ovarian carcinomaSpatial heterogeneityTumour heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID36038111
PMCPMC10248863
OpenAlexW4293378940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.