ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2022
Limited Contribution of Donor Characteristics to One-Year Survival After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A large number of association studies have related donor characteristics to survival after bone marrow transplantation, for leukemia in general and specifically for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, population-based differences often do not hold at the single transplant level. We test whether transplantation outcomes can be predicted at the single-patient level and whether such predictions can be used to better choose donors. The analysis was performed on a mixture of different diseases or with AML only, and with either patient and donor information or donor information only. We analyzed 3671 8-of-8 HLA-matched AML donor-recipient pairs and tested whether the outcome, including 1-year total and event-free survival, can be predicted from patient and donor-related factors. We used multiple machine learning and survival analysis methods. The best method is a fully connected neural network. Multiple outcomes can be predicted, with area under the specificity-sensitivity curve (AUC) values between 0.54 and 0.67 for the different outcomes. The patient age has a strong impact on prediction. However, for a given patient, when only donor or transplant information is used, limited prediction accuracy of 0.54 to 0.56 AUC for event-free survival and survival is obtained. Graft-versus-host disease and rejection after 1 year have slightly higher AUC values of around 0.59, whereas the relapse prediction accuracy was random. All donors' characteristics have a limited influence on the quality of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for fully matched donors. Many factors with a population effect on survival have a very limited effect when combined with all other factors in a single-donor predictive model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.