Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038015›Full record

ReviewBrain research bulletin2022

Effect of menthol on nicotine reduction: Pooled results from two double-blind randomized controlled trials.

Wenxue Lin, Andrea L Hobkirk, Junjia Zhu, Nicolle M Krebs, John E Hayes, John P Richie, Jason Liao, Kimberly Horn, Jonathan Foulds, Joshua E Muscat

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Association between Body Mass Index and Glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) in the US Population's Diabetes Status.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenxue LinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States. Electronic address: wlin2@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
Andrea L HobkirkDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Junjia ZhuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Nicolle M KrebsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
John E HayesSensory Evaluation Center, Pennsylvania State University, 220 Erickson Food Science Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States; Department of Food Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 220 Erickson Food Science Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
John P RichieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Jason LiaoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Kimberly HornDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA 24016, United States.
Jonathan FouldsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Joshua E MuscatDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Pennsylvania State University · USCarilion Clinic · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Research Training and Educational Component (Component I) p370-385P50DA036107 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI FOULDS, JONATHAN, MUSCAT, JOSHUA E · 2013 to 2018
$19.5M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Identifying circuit-level neuromarkers of smoking dependence that change in response to interventionK23DA045081 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI HOBKIRK, ANDREA · 2018 to 2022
$816k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA045081NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenthol upregulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and is associated with tobacco dependence. The effects of menthol when smoking cigarettes with varying low nicotine content up to 98 % (e.g., non-addicting) less than commercial cigarettes is not well understood. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is considering two tobacco product standards in cigarettes including banning menthol and reducing nicotine content. These new standards have the potential to significantly reduce smoking initiation and maintenance by limiting the mechanistic effects of nicotine and menthol on the brain.

methodsWe conducted two parallel randomized clinical trials of gradually reduced nicotine in cigarettes from 11.6 mg down to 0.2 mg nicotine/cigarette (very low nicotine content; VLNC) vs. usual nicotine content (11.6 mg; UNC) over an 18-week period in people who smoke cigarettes with low socioeconomic status (SES) and mental health conditions.

resultsCompared to UNC, VLNC was associated with significant reductions in cotinine, cigarettes per day, expired carbon monoxide levels, nicotine dependence and symptomology. These associations did not differ between menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, except people who smoke menthol cigarettes had less of a cotinine reduction in the SES trial. The pooled odds ratio of being adherent with using only VLNC study cigarettes in the gradual nicotine reduction arm for people who smoke non-menthol vs. menthol cigarettes was 2.6 (95 % CI:1.0, 6.4; p-value: 0.04).

conclusionsWhen nicotine is lowered to non-addicting levels, the results indicate an independent effect of menthol on the need to sustain nicotine intake in addicted people who smoke cigarettes.

Indexed as

Receptors, NicotinicSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderCarbon MonoxideCotinineHumansMentholNicotineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCarbon MonoxideCotinineMentholNicotineReceptors, NicotinicCotinineMentholRandomized controlled trialSmoking behaviorsVery low nicotine content cigarette

Identifiers

PMID36038015
PMCPMC10650975
OpenAlexW4293387142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.