Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36037984›Full record

Trial reportChest2023

A 30-Minute Spontaneous Breathing Trial Misses Many Children Who Go On to Fail a 120-Minute Spontaneous Breathing Trial.

Kelby E Knox, Justin C Hotz, Christopher J L Newth, Michael C K Khoo, Robinder G Khemani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03266016 (Identifying and Preventing Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03266016 nacompletednot on this map

Identifying and Preventing Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Los AngelesRan2017 to 2024Enrolled248ConditionsVentilation Therapy, Complications, Diaphragm Disease, Pediatric Respiratory DiseasesArmsComputerized Ventilator Protocol, Esophageal Manometry, Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography (RIP), Diaphragm Ultrasound, Maximal Inspiratory Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelby E KnoxDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: kknox@chla.usc.edu.
Justin C HotzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Christopher J L NewthDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Michael C K KhooDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California Viterbi School of Engineering, Los Angeles, CA.
Robinder G KhemaniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Pathobiologic profile and outcomes of critically ill children and adolescents exposed to vaping and e-cigarettesR01HL134666 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI KHEMANI, ROBINDER · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal length of spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) in children is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: What are the most common reasons for SBT failure in children, and when do they occur? Can clinical parameters at the 30-min mark of a 120-min SBT predict outcome? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a clinical trial in pediatric ARDS, in which 2-h SBTs are conducted daily. SBT failure is based on objective criteria, including esophageal manometry for effort of breathing, categorized as passage, early failure (≤ 30 min), or late failure (30-120 min). Spirometry was used to calculate respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (Vt), and rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), in addition to pulse oximetry and capnography. Predictive models evaluated parameters at 30 min against SBT outcome, using receiver operating characteristic plots and area under the curve.

resultsWe included 100 children and 305 SBTs, with 42% of SBTs being successful, 32% failing within 30 min, and 25% failing between 30 and 120 min. Of the patients passing SBTs at 30 min, 40% went on to fail by 120 min. High respiratory effort (esophageal manometry) was present in > 80% of failed SBTs. At the 30-min mark, there were no clear thresholds for RR, Vt, RSBI, Fio

interpretationA 30-min SBT may be too short in children recovering from pediatric ARDS because many go on to fail between 30 and 120 min. Reassuring values of Vt, RR, and gas exchange at 30 min do not reliably predict SBT passage at 2 h, likely because they do not capture the effort of breathing. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03266016; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeVentilator WeaningChildHumansRespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Rateairway extubationARDSpediatricventilator weaning

Identifiers

PMID36037984
PMCPMC9993340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.