Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36037814›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.

Joana Margarida Araújo Pereira, Vera Filipa Batista Trocado, Sandra Marina Sousa Gomes, Mariana Carlos-Alves, Agostinho Carvalho, Paula Alexandra Pinheiro

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase ReportsObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joana Margarida Araújo PereiraServiço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-973X
Vera Filipa Batista TrocadoServiço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5393-9236
Sandra Marina Sousa GomesServiço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-6862
Mariana Carlos-AlvesServiço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7332-3682
Agostinho CarvalhoServiço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8935-8030
Paula Alexandra PinheiroServiço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4477-4772
Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFemale sterilization is a surgical procedure that aims women to permanently stop the use of conception. The benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness are important issues. The purpose of this study was comparing the applicability, complications and efficacy of salpingectomy versus electrocoagulation and tubal occlusion by laparoscopy in the Ambulatory Surgery Unit.

methodsWe performed a retrospective and observational study that included women undergoing laparoscopic sterilization procedures at our Ambulatory Surgery Unit, during three years. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, applying the Fisher exact test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Linear Regression.

resultsTwo hundred and twenty-one laparoscopic surgical procedures were performed, including 79 (35.7%) bilateral total salpingectomies and 142 (64.3%) electrocoagulation and bilateral tubal occlusion procedures. The majority of the procedures were performed by a resident (

conclusionSalpingectomy is a safe and effective alternative comparing with electrocoagulation and tubal occlusion.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySterilization, TubalElectrocoagulationFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSalpingectomy

Identifiers

PMID36037814
PMCPMC9948043
OpenAlexW4293510187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.