Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36037735›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2022

Choice of buffer in mobile phase can substantially alter peak areas in quantification of lipids by HPLC-ELSD.

Oliva Graceffa, Eunice Kim, Rachel Broweleit, Robert J Rawle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oliva GraceffaDepartment of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Eunice KimDepartment of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Rachel BroweleitDepartment of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Robert J RawleDepartment of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA. Electronic address: bjr2@williams.edu.

Funding

Investigation of the biophysical mechanisms and membrane determinants ofrespirovirus binding and fusion using artificial lipid membranes and isolatedphysiological membranes as targetsR15AI171754 · NIAID · WILLIAMS COLLEGE · PI Robert J. Rawle · 2022 to 2026
$879k
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI171754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaporative light scattering detectors (ELSD) are commonly used with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to separate and quantify lipids, which are typically not easily detectable by more conventional methods such as UV-visible detectors. In many HPLC-ELSD methods to analyze lipids, a volatile buffer is included in the mobile phase to control the pH and facilitate separation between lipid species. Here, we report an unintended effect that buffer choice can have in HPLC-ELSD analysis of lipids - the identity and concentration of the buffer can substantially influence the resulting ELSD peak areas. To isolate this effect, we use a simple isocratic methanol mobile phase supplemented with different concentrations of commonly used buffers for ELSD analysis, and quantify the effect on peak width, peak shape, and peak area for seven different lipids (POPC, DOPE, cholesterol, sphingomyelin, DOTAP, DOPS, and lactose ceramide). We find that the ELSD peak areas for different lipids can change substantially depending on the mobile phase buffer composition, even in cases where the peak width and shape are unchanged. For a subset of analytes which are UV-active, we also demonstrate that the peak area quantified by UV remains unchanged under different buffer conditions, indicating that this effect is particular to ELSD quantification. We speculate that this ELSD-buffer effect may be the result of a variety of physical phenomenon, including: modification of aerosol droplet size, alteration of clustering of analytes during evaporation of the mobile phase, and mass-amplification or ion-pair effects, all of which could lead to differences in observed peak areas. Such effects would be expected to be molecule-specific, consistent with our data. We anticipate that this report will be useful for researchers designing and implementing HPLC-ELSD methods, especially of lipids.

Indexed as

LightSphingomyelinsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidIndicators and ReagentsPhysical PhenomenaScattering, RadiationIndicators and ReagentsSphingomyelinsEvaporative light scattering detection (ELSD)High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)Lipids

Identifiers

PMID36037735
PMCPMC10283026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.