Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36037349›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Additive genetic effects in interacting species jointly determine the outcome of caterpillar herbivory.

Zachariah Gompert, Tara Saley, Casey Philbin, Su'ad A Yoon, Eva Perry, Michelle E Sneck, Joshua G Harrison, C Alex Buerkle, James A Fordyce, Chris C Nice and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of species' range and niche in changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Additive genetic effects in interacting species jointly determine the outcome of caterpillar herbivory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zachariah GompertDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-2488
Tara SaleyDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.
Casey PhilbinHitchcock Center for Chemical Ecology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.ORCID 0000-0001-9782-5356
Su'ad A YoonDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Eva PerryDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Michelle E SneckDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.
Joshua G HarrisonDepartment of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.
C Alex BuerkleDepartment of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071.ORCID 0000-0003-4222-8858
James A FordyceDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.ORCID 0000-0002-2731-0418
Chris C NiceDepartment of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-6891
Craig D DodsonHitchcock Center for Chemical Ecology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.
Sarah L LebeisDepartment of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.
Lauren K LucasDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.
Matthew L ForisterDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.ORCID 0000-0003-2765-4779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-insect interactions are common and important in basic and applied biology. Trait and genetic variation can affect the outcome and evolution of these interactions, but the relative contributions of plant and insect genetic variation and how these interact remain unclear and are rarely subject to assessment in the same experimental context. Here, we address this knowledge gap using a recent host-range expansion onto alfalfa by the Melissa blue butterfly. Common garden rearing experiments and genomic data show that caterpillar performance depends on plant and insect genetic variation, with insect genetics contributing to performance earlier in development and plant genetics later. Our models of performance based on caterpillar genetics retained predictive power when applied to a second common garden. Much of the plant genetic effect could be explained by heritable variation in plant phytochemicals, especially saponins, peptides, and phosphatidyl cholines, providing a possible mechanistic understanding of variation in the species interaction. We find evidence of polygenic, mostly additive effects within and between species, with consistent effects of plant genotype on growth and development across multiple butterfly species. Our results inform theories of plant-insect coevolution and the evolution of diet breadth in herbivorous insects and other host-specific parasites.

Indexed as

ButterfliesHerbivoryPlantsAnimalsGenotypeLarvacoevolutiongenomic predictionphytochemicalsplant–insect interactionpolygenic

Identifiers

PMID36037349
PMCPMC9456756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.