Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36037341›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Alum-anchored intratumoral retention improves the tolerability and antitumor efficacy of type I interferon therapies.

Emi A Lutz, Yash Agarwal, Noor Momin, Sarah C Cowles, Joseph R Palmeri, Ellen Duong, Vladlena Hornet, Allison Sheen, Brianna M Lax, Adrienne M Rothschilds and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Biomaterial-Based In Situ Cancer Vaccines.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emi A LutzKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-7649-4241
Yash AgarwalKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Noor MominKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-3145-6089
Sarah C CowlesKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Joseph R PalmeriKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Ellen DuongKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-7112
Vladlena HornetKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Allison SheenKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Brianna M LaxKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Adrienne M RothschildsKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Darrell J IrvineKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-1405
Stefani SprangerKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-4546
K Dane WittrupKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-2398-5896
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Jacqueline A. Lees · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Training Grant in Molecular Imaging Research (MGH/HMS)T32CA079443 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WEISSLEDER, MD, PHD, RALPH · 2000 to 2025
$10.1M
Localized immunotherapy using alum-binding therapeuticsR01EB031082 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVINE, DARRELL J, WITTRUP, KARL DANE · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Localizing Immunotherapy to Improve Therapeutic IndexR01CA174795 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WITTRUP, KARL DANE · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174795NCI NIH HHS T32 CA079443NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective antitumor immunity in mice requires activation of the type I interferon (IFN) response pathway. IFNα and IFNβ therapies have proven promising in humans, but suffer from limited efficacy and high toxicity. Intratumoral IFN retention ameliorates systemic toxicity, but given the complexity of IFN signaling, it was unclear whether long-term intratumoral retention of type I IFNs would promote or inhibit antitumor responses. To this end, we compared the efficacy of IFNα and IFNβ that exhibit either brief or sustained retention after intratumoral injection in syngeneic mouse tumor models. Significant enhancement in tumor retention, mediated by anchoring these IFNs to coinjected aluminum-hydroxide (alum) particles, greatly improved both their tolerability and efficacy. The improved efficacy of alum-anchored IFNs could be attributed to sustained pleiotropic effects on tumor cells, immune cells, and nonhematopoietic cells. Alum-anchored IFNs achieved high cure rates of B16F10 tumors upon combination with either anti-PD-1 antibody or interleukin-2. Interestingly however, these alternative combination immunotherapies yielded disparate T cell phenotypes and differential resistance to tumor rechallenge, highlighting important distinctions in adaptive memory formation for combinations of type I IFNs with other immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Aluminum HydroxideImmunotherapyInterferon Type IAlum CompoundsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDisease Models, AnimalHumansInterferon-alphaInterferon-betaMetal NanoparticlesMiceAlum CompoundsAluminum HydroxideAntineoplastic AgentsInterferon-alphaInterferon-betaInterferon Type Ialumcancerimmunotherapyinterferonintratumoral

Identifiers

PMID36037341
PMCPMC9457244
OpenAlexW4293484444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.