ArticlePloS one2022
Barriers and enablers to the effective implementation of robotic assisted surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-gen vision: a systematic review on robotics transforming ophthalmic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional autologous breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- First United States experience of robotic-assisted minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair using the Dexter surgical system.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Medical students' perceptions and curriculum preferences for robotic surgery in Oman: a cross-sectional study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Early clinical outcomes of thoracic surgery using the Saroa surgical system: a single institution retrospective observational study of perioperative outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Inpatient Nurses' Anticipatory Perspectives on Assistive Robots: Qualitative Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Aortic robotic surgery in Ireland: infrastructure without implementation - Is now the time to act?Irish journal of medical science · 2026Review
- A preliminary validation study showing comparable accuracy between Computed Tomography based and imageless portable navigation systems when both systems are used.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Responsible adoption of robot-assisted surgery within health systems in middle-income countries: a narrative review and practical governance framework.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Implementation of a robotic surgery program in Peru: a retrospective cohort study of case mix, perioperative outcomes, and predictors of operative time.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Optimizing AI implementation for surgery: recommendations for infrastructure and deployment in the operating room.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Budget impact analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional spine surgery in Spain.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Reaching proficiency in robotic liver surgery in two high-volume European HPB centers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- "Results of the structured implementation of a robotic acute care surgery program".Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Global analysis and prospects of assisted pedicle screw placement surgery: a bibliometric study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- The promises and challenges of robotic-assisted surgery in regional Australia.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- The road to 100: single center experience with the first 100 consecutive robotic kidney transplants.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotics vs. laparoscopy in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in the IGOMIPS registry: when glitter does not equal superiority.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Unveiling the landscape of robotic surgery: Insights into Indian medical perspectives.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Knowledge translation in surgery: a scoping review of implementation strategies, effectiveness and contextual barriers and enablers.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImplementation of Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS) is complex as it requires adjustments to associated physical infrastructure, but also changes to processes and behaviours. With the global objective of optimising and improving RAS implementation, this study aimed to: 1) Explore the barriers and enablers to RAS service adoption, incorporating an assessment of behavioural influences; 2) Provide an optimised plan for effective RAS implementation, with the incorporation of theory-informed implementation strategies that have been adapted to address the barriers/enablers that affect RAS service adoption.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with RAS personnel and stakeholders, including: surgeons, theatre staff, managers, industry representatives, and policy-makers/commissioners. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to identify barriers and enablers that represent individual behaviours, capabilities, attitudes, beliefs, and external organisational factors that influence the implementation of RAS.
resultsFindings suggest that implementation planning has three separate phases-pre-, early, and late implementation. For pre-implementation, barriers and enablers identified included the cost of RAS equipment and issues of economic viability, weak outcome evidence for RAS, a preponderance of an eminence driven model, the clinician/manager relationship, and views around the uptake and expansion of RAS in the future. Early implementation findings revealed role changes for theatre personnel and an enhanced team approach, reliance on industry for training provision, and changes in skill sets and attentional processes. Late implementation factors included equipment maintenance costs, technological limitations, changes to cognition during RAS routine use, and benefits to institutions/healthcare professionals (such as ergonomic improvement).
conclusionTogether, findings suggest the factors that affect RAS implementation are multi-faceted and change across the life-cycle of intervention adoption. Theory-informed strategies are suggested which can optimise implementation of RAS. Optimisation strategies need planning from the outset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.