ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022
HPV16-E6/E7 Oncogene Mutation and p53 Expression among Indonesian Women with Cervical Cancer.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical Cancer in the Era of HPV: Translating Molecular Mechanisms into Preventive Public Health Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Influence of Human Papillomavirus E6 Gene Mutation on Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Regulation and Cell Proliferation in Cervical Neoplasia: Insights Into Molecular Mechanisms.OncoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
- MicroRNA-875-5p inhibits the growth and metastasis of cervical cancer cells by promoting autophagy and apoptosis and inhibiting the epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize HPV16 E6/E7 mutation and its association with p53 expression among Indonesian women with cervical cancer.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study involving 31 Indonesian women with pathologically proven cervical cancer and HPV16 infection. Data about the clinical characteristics of the study population were obtained from the medical records. Biopsy specimen of the cervical cancer mass from each study participant was obtained for DNA isolation. The ORFs of E6 and E7 genes were amplified using specific primer designed according to K02718/HPV16R gene sequence obtained from GenBank. Sequencing was performed using software program MEGA10. HPV16 E6 and E7 prototype sequences for nucleotide alignment (HPv16. P, GenBank Access code: NC_001526) was selected from European variant. The sequence of nucleotide and amino acid was aligned using software program BioEdit. p53 expression was evaluated through immunohistochemistry and quantified using immunoreactivity score (IRS).
resultsTwelve subjects (38.7%) present with E6 and E7 mutation. Median age, parity, stage and histologic type of the tumour did not associate with E6/E7 mutation. E6 and E7 mutation rate was 25.8% (8/31) and 12.9% (4/31), respectively. Seven single nucleotide changes were identified within the E6 and E7 oncogenes, including four non-synonymous and three synonymous mutations. E6 T27C was the most prevalent mutation (16.1%). Nonsynonymous mutations were more prevalent within E7 gene (9.6%) (N29T, N29S, and R77C). Median IRS did not differ between HPV16-E6/E7 variants and wildtype (p value = 0.990). There was no association between E6/E7 mutations and p53 expression in Indonesian women with cervical cancer (PR 1.4, 95% CI: 0.29-6.77, p value = 0.704).
conclusionsHPV16 E6 mutation was more prevalent than E7 mutation among Indonesian women. There was no association between E6/E7 mutation and p53 expression level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.