ArticleJAMA network open2022
Patient Preferences for Strategies to Improve Tuberculosis Diagnostic Services in Zambia.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Preferences of Patients With Tuberculosis for AI-Assisted Remote Health Management: Discrete Choice Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Resident Preferences for Telemedicine Services in China in the Digital Health Era: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
- Preferences for TB treatment and support delivery models among people living with TB in Eastern Cape, South Africa: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Important Continuous Glucose Monitoring Attributes for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Transforming Nursing Practice to Optimize Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Associated Comorbidities in the Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania.The open nursing journal · 2025Article
- Usability and acceptability of a novel TB infection diagnostic test among key populations in Mexicali.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Preferences of people living with HIV for features of tuberculosis preventive treatment regimens in Uganda: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- Person-centered strategies for delivering TB diagnostic services in Lima, Peru.Public health action · 2023Article
- Preferences of people living with HIV for features of tuberculosis preventive treatment regimens - a discrete choice experiment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Placing the values and preferences of people most affected by TB at the center of screening and testing: an approach for reaching the unreached.BMC global and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Delayed engagement in tuberculosis (TB) services is associated with ongoing transmission and poor clinical outcomes. Objective: To assess whether patients with TB have differential preferences for strategies to improve the public health reach of TB diagnostic services. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in which a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was administered between September 18, 2019, and January 17, 2020, to 401 adults (>18 years of age) with microbiologically confirmed TB in Lusaka, Zambia. The DCE had 7 attributes with 2 to 3 levels per attribute related to TB service enhancements. Latent class analysis was used to identify segments of participants with unique preferences. Multiscenario simulations were used to estimate shares of preferences for different TB service improvement strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were patient preference archetypes and estimated shares of preferences for different strategies to improve TB diagnostic services. Collected data were analyzed between January 3, 2022, to July 2, 2022. Results: Among 326 adults with TB (median [IQR] age, 34 [27-42] years; 217 [66.8%] male; 158 [48.8%] HIV positive), 3 groups with distinct preferences for TB service improvements were identified. Group 1 (192 participants [58.9%]) preferred a facility that offered same-day TB test results, shorter wait times, and financial incentives for testing. Group 2 (83 participants [25.4%]) preferred a facility that provided same-day TB results, had greater privacy, and was closer to home. Group 3 (51 participants [15.6%]) had no strong preferences for service improvements and had negative preferences for receiving telephone-based TB test results. Groups 1 and 2 were more likely to report at least a 4-week delay in seeking health care for their current TB episode compared with group 3 (29 [51.3%] in group 1, 95 [35.8%] in group 2, and 10 [19.6%] in group 3; P < .001). Strategies to improve TB diagnostic services most preferred by all participants were same-day TB test results alone (shares of preference, 69.9%) and combined with a small financial testing incentive (shares of preference, 79.3%), shortened wait times (shares of preference, 76.1%), or greater privacy (shares of preference, 75.0%). However, the most preferred service improvement strategies differed substantially by group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients with TB had heterogenous preferences for TB diagnostic service improvements associated with differential health care-seeking behavior. Tailored strategies that incorporate features most valued by persons with undiagnosed TB, including same-day results, financial incentives, and greater privacy, may optimize reach by overcoming key barriers to timely TB care engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.