ArticleJAMA neurology2022
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuroimage analysis using artificial intelligence approaches: a systematic review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Pooled it
- Acceptance of Machine Learning for Medication Selection in Epilepsy to Inform Clinical Trial Design: Co-Design Survey Study.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs: Regulatory Frameworks, Bioequivalence, and Model-Informed Precision Dosing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- A translational multimodal machine-learning prototype predicting valproate response in epilepsy treatment.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence That Changes Clinical Neurology Practice: Translating Algorithms Into Actionable Care.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Establishment of the China Elderly Comorbidity Medical Database (CECMed) and its application in machine learning-based prediction.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Enhancing Drug Response Prediction in Epilepsy with Emerging Multimodal Models: Focus on Clinical, Pharmacologic, and Genomic Factors.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Lightweight deep learning model for nonconvulsive status epilepticus diagnosis using EEG time-frequency analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine-learning methods for epilepsy diagnosis and therapeutic prevention: advances, setbacks, and opportunities.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Teprotumumab Treatment Response in Thyroid Eye Disease.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Individual 18F-FDG PET and arterial spin labeling coupling based on simultaneous PET/MRI predicting anti-seizure medication response in temporal lobe epilepsy patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in epilepsy: antiseizure medication response, epileptogenic zone localization, and surgical outcome prediction.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Assessing an Automated Noncontrast CT-based Pipeline for Sacral Tumor Classification Using a Hip Bone Reference Frame.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- AI for precision epilepsy: ASM response prediction needs real-world validation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- The efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric epilepsy in China: a multicenter cohort study.Acta epileptologica · 2025Article
- Risk model for depression in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A retrospective cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Prediction of personalized antiseizure medications response based on clinical signatures in epilepsy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Towards precision MRI biomarkers in epilepsy with normative modelling.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Multi-omics: a bridge connecting genotype and phenotype for epilepsy?Biomarker research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Selection of antiseizure medications (ASMs) for epilepsy remains largely a trial-and-error approach. Under this approach, many patients have to endure sequential trials of ineffective treatments until the "right drugs" are prescribed. Objective: To develop and validate a deep learning model using readily available clinical information to predict treatment success with the first ASM for individual patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study developed and validated a prognostic model. Patients were treated between 1982 and 2020. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until failure of the first ASM. A total of 2404 adults with epilepsy newly treated at specialist clinics in Scotland, Malaysia, Australia, and China between 1982 and 2020 were considered for inclusion, of whom 606 (25.2%) were excluded from the final cohort because of missing information in 1 or more variables. Exposures: One of 7 antiseizure medications. Main Outcomes and Measures: With the use of the transformer model architecture on 16 clinical factors and ASM information, this cohort study first pooled all cohorts for model training and testing. The model was trained again using the largest cohort and externally validated on the other 4 cohorts. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), weighted balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model were all assessed for predicting treatment success based on the optimal probability cutoff. Treatment success was defined as complete seizure freedom for the first year of treatment while taking the first ASM. Performance of the transformer model was compared with other machine learning models. Results: The final pooled cohort included 1798 adults (54.5% female; median age, 34 years [IQR, 24-50 years]). The transformer model that was trained using the pooled cohort had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67) and a weighted balanced accuracy of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.64) on the test set. The model that was trained using the largest cohort only had AUROCs ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 and a weighted balanced accuracy ranging from 0.51 to 0.62 in the external validation cohorts. Number of pretreatment seizures, presence of psychiatric disorders, electroencephalography, and brain imaging findings were the most important clinical variables for predicted outcomes in both models. The transformer model that was developed using the pooled cohort outperformed 2 of the 5 other models tested in terms of AUROC. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a deep learning model showed the feasibility of personalized prediction of response to ASMs based on clinical information. With improvement of performance, such as by incorporating genetic and imaging data, this model may potentially assist clinicians in selecting the right drug at the first trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.