Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036895›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2023

Experience with a nurse-driven genetic counseling pathway of Italian women with uninformative BRCA test result.

Eva Blondeaux, Matteo Lambertini, Giulia Buzzatti, Carla Bruzzone, Marina Baraga, Roberta Pisani, Lucia Del Mastro, Paolo Pronzato, Liliana Varesco, Luigina Bonelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva BlondeauxBreast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9566-4579
Matteo LambertiniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Giulia BuzzattiBreast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Carla BruzzoneHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Marina BaragaHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Roberta PisaniHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Lucia Del MastroBreast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Paolo PronzatoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Liliana VarescoHereditary Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Luigina BonelliClinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several models of genetic counseling have been proposed to tackle the increasing volume of individuals requiring access to BRCA testing. Few data are available on patient experience and retention of information with nurse-driven genetic counseling. We evaluated the experience and retention of information in women with an uninformative BRCA test result and who were not considered at high risk due to their personal/family history of cancer who underwent geneticist-supervised nurse-driven genetic counseling and who received their test result by phone. Women who received an uninformative BRCA test result between May 2017 and September 2019 were administered a questionnaire exploring experience with genetic counseling and retention of information provided. Of 366 eligible women, 299 (273 breast cancer patients and 26 women without breast cancer) completed the interview. Overall, 280 women (93.6%) positively valued their experience with genetic counseling and 287 (96.0%) considered it helpful with 57.5% of them feeling reassured for themselves and their family. Information on the clinical implications of the test result was correctly retained and women acted accordingly. Overall, 252 women (87.8%) accurately reported their test result as normal/negative. Only 67 (22.4%) recognized that despite a normal BRCA test result, a low probability of a hereditary syndrome remains. Most women showed a poor ability to estimate cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers and in the general population. Geneticist-supervised nurse-driven genetic counseling process for women with uninformative BRCA test result is associated with a positive patient experience and an adequate retention of information concerning the management of their personal and familial cancer risk. The design and implementation of nurse-driven genetic counseling models may contribute to efficient and timely access to BRCA genetic testing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic CounselingFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMutationgenetic counselingpractice modelsservice delivery models

Identifiers

PMID36036895
PMCPMC10087002
OpenAlexW4293457606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.