Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036858›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2022

Is It Time for Ocrelizumab Extended Interval Dosing in Relapsing Remitting MS? Evidence from An Italian Multicenter Experience During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Aurora Zanghì, Carlo Avolio, Elisabetta Signoriello, Gianmarco Abbadessa, Maria Cellerino, Diana Ferraro, Christian Messina, Stefania Barone, Graziella Callari, Elena Tsantes and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and radiological activity after extended interval and standard interval dosing of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Discontinuation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: reoccurrence of disease activity.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Extended-interval dosing of rituximab/ocrelizumab is associated with a reduced decrease in IgG levels in multiple sclerosis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ocrelizumab use in multiple sclerosis: a real-world experience in a changing therapeutic scenario.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Aurora ZanghìUOC Neurology, Sant'Elia Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy.
Carlo AvolioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Elisabetta SignorielloMultiple Sclerosis Center, II Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Gianmarco AbbadessaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Avanzate, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Piazza Miraglia, 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Maria CellerinoDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Mother-Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Diana FerraroUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Christian MessinaDepartment "G.F. Ingrassia", MS Center University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Stefania BaroneAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "Mater Domini", Catanzaro, Italy.
Graziella CallariInstitute Foundation "G. Giglio", Cefalù, Italy.
Elena TsantesDepartment of General Medicine, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Patrizia SolaUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Paola ValentinoAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "Mater Domini", Catanzaro, Italy.
Franco GranellaUnit of Neurosciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesco PattiDepartment "G.F. Ingrassia", MS Center University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giacomo LusMultiple Sclerosis Center, II Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Simona BonavitaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Avanzate, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Piazza Miraglia, 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Matilde IngleseDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Mother-Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Emanuele D'AmicoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. emanuele.damico@unifg.it.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-9057
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitario Mater Domini · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Parma · ITFondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the COVID-19 pandemic era, safety concerns have been raised regarding the risk of severe infection following administration of ocrelizumab (OCR), a B-cell-depleting therapy. We enrolled all relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients who received maintenance doses of OCR from January 2020 to June 2021. Data were extracted in December 2021. Standard interval dosing (SID) was defined as a regular maintenance interval of OCR infusion every 6 months, whereas extended interval dosing (EID) was defined as an OCR infusion delay of at least 4 weeks. Three infusions were considered in defining SID vs. EID (infusions A, B, and C). Infusion A was the last infusion before January 2020. The primary study outcome was a comparison of disease activity during the A-C interval, which was defined as either clinical (new relapses) or radiological (new lesions on T1-gadolinium or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences). Second, we aimed to assess confirmed disability progression (CDP). A total cohort of 278 patients (174 on SID and 104 on EID) was enrolled. Patients who received OCR on EID had a longer disease duration and a higher rate of vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (p < 0.05). EID was associated with an increased risk of MRI activity during the A-C interval (OR 5.373, 95% CI 1.203-24.001, p = 0.028). Being on SID or EID did not influence CDP (V-Cramer 0.47, p = 0.342). EID seemed to be associated with a higher risk of MRI activity in our cohort. EID needs to be carefully considered for OCR-treated patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingGadoliniumHumansImmunologic FactorsPandemicsRecurrenceGadoliniumImmunologic FactorsDisease activityExtended interval dosingMRIOcrelizumabStandard interval dosing

Identifiers

PMID36036858
PMCPMC9422942
OpenAlexW4293463320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.