Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036852›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Reconstruction and functional results after gastric resection].

W Schröder, H Fuchs, J Straatman, B Babic

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W SchröderKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. Wolfgang.schroeder@uk-koeln.de.
H FuchsKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
J StraatmanAfdeling Heelkunde, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, Niederlande.
B BabicKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depending on the extent of gastric resection, namely total, proximal or distal gastrectomy, different methods of reconstruction are available. These reconstructive procedures have not changed with the implementation of minimally invasive or robotic techniques in general but the spectrum of possible anastomotic techniques has been substantially expanded. Functional, in particular nutritional disorders with subsequent impairment of the health-related quality of life, are often diagnosed after gastric resections. The partial preservation of a gastric reservoir has a positive impact on the extent of these disorders. After total gastrectomy, the placement of a jejunal pouch significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative dumping symptoms. Following proximal gastrectomy, double-tract reconstruction offers certain functional advantages as compared to the simple Roux‑Y reconstruction. In Germany, these reconstructive techniques are only used to a low extent and should be include in the repertoire of oncological gastric surgery with appropriate indications.

Indexed as

GastrectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBillroth II reconstructionDouble-tract reconstructionDumping symptomPostgastrectomy syndromeRoux‑Y reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.