Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036655›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2022

'It's like if a vape pen and a cigarette had a baby': a mixed methods study of perceptions and use of IQOS among US young adults.

Zongshuan Duan, Daisy Le, Annie C Ciceron, Ruth Dickey-Chasins, Christina N Wysota, Yael Bar-Zeev, Hagai Levine, Lorien C Abroms, Katelyn F Romm, Carla J Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. IQOS Marketing Strategies and Expenditures in the United States From Market Entrance in 2019 to Withdrawal in 2021.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zongshuan DuanDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, #7000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2598-1752
Daisy LeDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, #7000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Annie C CiceronDepartment of Policy, Populations, and Systems, School of Nursing, George Washington University, 1919 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Ruth Dickey-ChasinsDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Christina N WysotaDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, #7000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Yael Bar-ZeevBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Organization, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem 9110202, Israel.
Hagai LevineBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Organization, PO Box 12272, Jerusalem 9110202, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-4916
Lorien C AbromsDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, #7000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Katelyn F RommDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, #7000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Carla J BergDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 800 22nd St NW, #7000, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-1961

Funding

Testing a Digital Therapeutic for Smoking Cessation among Hispanic Persons who SmokeU54MD015946 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI Fatima Aziz Merchant · 2020 to 2026
$22.0M
Recreational Marijuana Marketing and Young Adult Consumer Behavior - Administrative SupplementR01DA054751 · NIDA · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Carla J Berg, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
Regulatory Impact on Vape Shops and Young Adults' Use of ENDS - Diversity SupplementR01CA215155 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Market Research to Predict Emerging Tobacco Product Use in Diverse Young AdultsR01CA179422 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Assessing IQOS Marketing Influences and Consumer Behavior in Israel: Implications for the USR01CA239178 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J, LEVINE, HAGAI · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
Helping Everyone Achieve a LifeTime of Health - Future Addiction Scientist TrainingR25DA054015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI OBASI, EZEMENARI M., REITZEL, LORRAINE R · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
An mHealth Positive Psychology Intervention to Reduce Cancer Burden in Young Adult Cancer SurvivorsR21CA261884 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AREM, HANNAH, BERG, CARLA J · 2022 to 2023
$428k
Parental Influences on Tobacco Use among Sexual Minority Young Adults in a New Market and Policy LandscapeF32DA055388 · NIDA · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ROMM, KATELYN · 2022 to 2022
$12k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA179422NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215155NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239178NCI NIH HHS R21 CA261884NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA055388NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA054751NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA054015NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD015946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young adults' perceptions and use of heated tobacco products (HTPs) are understudied. This mixed methods study analyzed (i) Fall 2020 survey data from 2470 US young adults (meanage = 24.67; 19.5% and 25.2% past-month cigarette and e-cigarette use; 4.1% ever HTP use) assessing HTP use intentions and perceptions (1 = not at all to 7 = extremely) and (ii) Spring 2021 interview data regarding IQOS (most widely available HTP) in a subset of 40 e-cigarette users. Among survey participants, HTPs versus cigarettes and e-cigarettes showed lower use intentions (mean = 1.27 vs. mean = 1.73, mean = 2.16) but were perceived as less addictive (mean = 5.11 vs. mean = 6.28, mean = 5.82) and harmful (mean = 5.37 vs. mean = 6.65, mean = 5.62). HTPs were perceived more socially acceptable than cigarettes but less than e-cigarettes (mean = 3.39 vs. mean = 3.13, mean = 4.37). Among interviewees, most reported limited HTP knowledge. A few perceived IQOS as a hybrid of traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Most perceived IQOS as harmful but less harmful than cigarettes and were uncertain in relation to e-cigarettes. Over half reported minimal interest in trying IQOS; common reasons included IQOS containing tobacco, limited flavors and use complexity. The varied perceptions of IQOS versus cigarettes and e-cigarettes underscore the need for continued surveillance of perceptions, use and marketing of IQOS to inform regulatory oversight and potential interventions.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID36036655
PMCPMC9502850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.