Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036611›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2022

Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine and Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria among Children in Western Kenya, 2016 to 2017.

Nelli Westercamp, Mary Owidhi, Kephas Otieno, Winnie Chebore, Ann M Buff, Meghna Desai, Simon Kariuki, Aaron M Samuels

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nelli WestercampMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0136-9750
Mary OwidhiMalaria Branch, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Kephas OtienoMalaria Branch, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Winnie CheboreMalaria Branch, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Ann M BuffMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Meghna DesaiMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Simon KariukiMalaria Branch, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-0554-1976
Aaron M SamuelsMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Preventiongrid.416738.f, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimalarial resistance threatens global malaria control efforts. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends routine antimalarial efficacy monitoring through a standardized therapeutic efficacy study (TES) protocol. From June 2016 to March 2017, children with uncomplicated P. falciparum mono-infection in Siaya County, Kenya were enrolled into a standardized TES and randomized (1:1 ratio) to a 3-day course of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). Efficacy outcomes were measured at 28 and 42 days. A total of 340 children were enrolled. All but one child cleared parasites by day 3. PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) was 88.5% (95% CI: 80.9 to 93.3%) at day 28 for AL and 93.0% (95% CI: 86.9 to 96.4%) at day 42 for DP. There were 9.6 times (95% CI: 3.4 to 27.2) more reinfections in the AL arm compared to the DP arm at day 28, and 3.1 times (95% CI: 1.9 to 4.9) more reinfections at day 42. Both AL and DP were efficacious (per WHO 90% cutoff in the confidence interval) and well tolerated for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in western Kenya, but AL efficacy appears to be waning. Further efficacy monitoring for AL, including pharmacokinetic studies, is recommended.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsFolic Acid AntagonistsMalariaMalaria, FalciparumQuinolinesArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationChildDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenesHumansInfantKenyaPiperazinesAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsartenimolDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenesFolic Acid AntagonistspiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolinesartemether-lumefantrinedihydroartemisinin-piperaquinein vivoKenyamalariarecrudescencetherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID36036611
PMCPMC9487560
OpenAlexW4293447100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.