Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036429›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

A function-based approach to model the measurement error in wearable devices.

Sneha Jadhav, Carmen D Tekwe, Yuanyuan Luan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sneha JadhavDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7135-803X
Carmen D TekweDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-1857-2416
Yuanyuan LuanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.

Funding

Measurement error correction approaches to wearable device-based measures of physical activity and self-reported measures of dietary intake in obesity and type 2 diabetes researchR01DK132385 · NIDDK · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI TEKWE, CARMEN D. · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK132385NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK132385-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is an important risk factor for many health outcomes. Wearable-devices such as accelerometers are increasingly used in biomedical studies to understand the associations between PA and health outcomes. Statistical analyses involving accelerometer data are challenging due to the following three characteristics: (i) high-dimensionality, (ii) temporal dependence, and (iii) measurement error. To address these challenges we treat accelerometer-based measures of PA as a single function-valued covariate prone to measurement error. Specifically, in order to determine the relationship between PA and a health outcome of interest, we propose a regression model with a functional covariate that accounts for measurement error. Using regression calibration, we develop a two-step estimation method for the model parameters and establish their consistency. A test is also proposed to test the significance of the estimated model parameters. Simulation studies are conducted to compare the proposed methods with existing alternative approaches under varying scenarios. Finally, the developed methods are used to assess the relationship between PA intensity and BMI obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.

Indexed as

AccelerometryWearable Electronic DevicesCalibrationExerciseHumansNutrition Surveysfunctional data analysismeasurement errorNHANES studywearable devices

Identifiers

PMID36036429
PMCPMC9804207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.