Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036219›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2022

Digital health understanding and preparedness of medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Martin Baumgartner, Christoph Sauer, Kathrin Blagec, Georg Dorffner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin BaumgartnerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2735-8235
Christoph SauerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8343-7296
Kathrin BlagecCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6261-5260
Georg DorffnerCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3181-2576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digitalisation is changing all areas of our daily life. This changing environment requires new competences from physicians in all specialities. This study systematically surveyed the knowledge, attitude, and interests of medical students. These results will help further develop the medical curriculum, as well as increase our understanding of future physicians by other healthcare market players. A web-based survey consisting of four sections was developed: Section one queried demographic data, section two assessed the current digital health knowledge of medical students, section three queried their attitudes about the future impact of digital health in medicine and section four assessed the recommendations medical students have for the medical curriculum in terms of digital health. This survey was distributed to all (11,978) student at all public Austrian medical schools. A total of 8.4% of the medical student population started the survey. At the knowledge self-assessment section, the medical students reached mean of 11.74 points (SD 4.42) out of a possible maximum of 32 (female mean 10.66/ SD 3.87, male mean 13.34/SD 4.50). The attitude section showed that students see digitalisation as a threat, especially with respect to the patient-physician relationship. The curriculum recommendation section showed a high interest for topics related to AI, a per study year increasing interest in impact of digital health in communication, as well as a decreasing interest in robotic related topics. The attitude towards digital health can be described as sceptical. To ensure that future physicians keep pace with this development and fulfil their responsibility towards the society, medical schools need to be more proactive to foster the understanding of medical students that digital health will persistently alter the medical practice.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePhysician-Patient RelationsSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTherapy, Computer-AssistedcurriculumDigital healthdigital skillseHealthmedical education

Identifiers

PMID36036219
PMCPMC9423824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.