Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035829›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Effect of Intelligent Operating Hole Towel in Cataract Patients.

Suhui Xu, Meijuan Lan, Haiyan Cai, Pei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suhui XuSecond Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Ophthalmology Department, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310007, China.
Meijuan LanSecond Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Ophthalmology Department, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310007, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-4068
Haiyan CaiSecond Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Ophthalmology Department, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310007, China.
Pei ZhangSecond Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Ophthalmology Department, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310007, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: The eyeball and its ancillary tissues are important organs with the same shape and structure, and examining the surgical site is particularly important in ophthalmic surgery. A safe and easy-to-operate ophthalmic surgical hole towel is of great significance for improving the safety of ophthalmic surgery. Objective: To explore the effect of intelligent operating hole towel in cataract patients. Methods: From April 2020 to April 2021, 1220 cases of cataract patients who needed surgery in the second affiliated hospital Zhejiang University college of medicine, were recruited and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group. The control group adopted a disposable ophthalmic single-port operation cloth, and the intelligent surgical hole towel was used in the observation group. Incidences of surgical site errors, the amount of operation time, bacterial infections, and patient satisfaction were recorded. Results: The average operation time in the observation group had obviously reduced compared with the control group ( Conclusions: The design and use of the new intelligent ophthalmic surgical hole towel can promote the efficiency of ophthalmic surgery, realize the intelligent verification of surgical eye, reduce the risk of surgical site errors and improve medical safety.

Indexed as

CataractHumans

Identifiers

PMID36035829
PMCPMC9410947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.