Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035828›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Analysis of the Current Situation of Teaching and Learning of Ideological and Political Theory Courses by Deep Learning.

Jin Chao, Yijiang Zhang

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jin ChaoMarxist Branch, Shaoxing University Yuanpei College, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China.
Yijiang ZhangInformation and Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Branch, Shaoxing University Yuanpei College, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4205-2127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives are to solve the problems existing in the current ideological and political theory courses, such as the difficulty of classroom teaching quality assessment, the confusion of teachers' classroom process management, and the lack of objective assessment basis in teaching quality monitoring. Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, a designed evaluation method is proposed for teachers' classroom teaching and solves some problems such as high system cost, low evaluation accuracy, and imperfect evaluation methods. Firstly, the boundary algorithm system is introduced in the research, and the Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) by deep learning (DL) is used to accelerate the server hardware network platform and equipped with pan tilt zoom (PTZ) and manage multiple AI + embedded visual boundary algorithm devices. Secondly, the network platform can manage the PTZ and focal length of Internet protocol (IP) cameras, measure, and capture face images, transmit data, and recognize students' face, head, and body postures. Finally, classroom teaching is evaluated, and students' behavioral data and functions are designed, debugged, and tested. The research results demonstrate that the method overcomes the problem of high system cost through edge computing and hardware structure, and DL technology is used to overcome the problem of low accuracy of classroom teaching evaluation. Various indicators such as attendance rate, concentration, activity, and richness of teaching links in classroom teaching are obtained. The method involved can make an objective evaluation of classroom teaching and overcome the problem of incomplete classroom teaching evaluation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansStudentsTeaching

Identifiers

PMID36035828
PMCPMC9410937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.