ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Artificial Intelligence-based Machine English-Assisted Translation in the Internet of Things Environment.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Artificial Intelligence-based Machine English-Assisted Translation in the Internet of Things Environment.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-13Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of Internet of Things technology, the things that machines do instead of humans are becoming more and more complicated. Machine translation has developed rapidly in the past few decades, and the translation system has also been greatly improved. People's life and work are inseparable from machine translation, which brings a lot of convenience to people. But machine translation also has many flaws. Although machine translation can translate long texts in a very short time, its translation quality is quite poor, especially in the face of advanced English such as professional English, terminology, abbreviations, etc. To this end, machine English-assisted translation systems have been developed in recent years. Different from the working principle of machine English translation, machine English-assisted translation is a method of artificial intelligence + human-computer interaction. It uses convolutional neural networks and deep learning to translate words efficiently. The translator puts the original text and the translation into the machine database each time, and the machine can process some English terms, complex sentences, technical English, and other advanced English after continuous learning. Machine English-assisted translation can reduce repeated translations and greatly improve translation quality and translation efficiency. In this paper, the combination of artificial intelligence and machine English-assisted translation is compared with machine English translation, and comparative experiments are carried out by setting different matching degrees. Experiments show that the translation efficiency of machine English-assisted translation is much better than that of machine English translation. As the matching rate increases, the translation efficiency of machine English-assisted translation is higher. When the matching rate is greater than 80%, the translation efficiency is three times that of machine English translation. However, it is slightly insufficient in processing pure, simple statements. It highlights the advantages of machine English-assisted translation in terms of term translation and long complex sentences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.