Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035731›Full record

ArticleCJC open2022

Safety of Cefazolin Test Dose in Patients With Penicillin Allergy Just Prior to Cardiac Device Implantation: A Single-Centre Experience.

Jean-François Sarrazin, Jamal Laaouaj, François Philippon, Marina Sanchez, Philippe Gervais, Jean Champagne, Christian Steinberg, Isabelle Nault, Karine Roy, Benoît Plourde and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jean-François SarrazinDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Jamal LaaouajDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
François PhilipponDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Marina SanchezDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Philippe GervaisDepartment of Infectious Disease, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Jean ChampagneDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Christian SteinbergDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Isabelle NaultDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Karine RoyDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Benoît PlourdeDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Louis BlierDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.
Gilles O'HaraDepartment of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Québec City, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cephalosporins are the cornerstone of cardiac device infection prophylaxis. Owing to fears of cross-reactivity, penicillin-allergic patients are exposed to potentially more-toxic drugs, with decreased efficacy. We evaluated the safety of a cefazolin test dose (CTD) in self-reported penicillin-allergic patients. Methods: In this single-centre study, we evaluated consecutive patients with chart documentation of penicillin allergy undergoing cardiac device implantation, over a 2-year period. A CTD was performed if no cephalosporin allergy or severe anaphylactic reaction to penicillin had been documented. Patients were given 2 doses of 100 mg IV cefazolin, and if no allergic reaction occurred after 5 minutes, the full dose (1800 mg) was administered in the electrophysiology laboratory just before the implantation procedure. Results: A total of 2200 patients were included. The frequency of reported penicillin allergy was 9.3% (n = 204). In 80% of cases, the type of allergic reaction was not reported in medical notes or was unknown by the patient. A CTD was performed in 67.6% of patients with a penicillin allergy (n = 138). A total of 5 adverse events occurred (3.6% of patients [95% confidence interval, 1.1%-6.1%]) - 4 skin rashes and 1 tongue edema. These 5 patients became asymptomatic after antihistaminic and corticosteroid IV treatment. Even if the test dose was negative, 79% of patients also were administered vancomycin before the procedure, as it requires a 1-hour infusion prior to the CTD in the implantation procedure room. Conclusion: A CTD in most penicillin-allergic patients appears to be safe and allows its use per recommended guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID36035731
PMCPMC9402946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.