ArticleMedical science educator2022
Implementation of Self-Directed Learning in Physiology for Phase 1 Undergraduate Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review.Medical education online · 2023Pooled it
- Implementing and evaluating an integrated self-directed learning method for 1Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Self-Directed Learning and the Jigsaw Method in Medical Physiology Education.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the primary roles played by Indian medical graduates is that of a lifelong learner. To this end, students must acquire the habit of self-directed learning (SDL). Lack of SDL skills among undergraduate medical students is a concern; hence, this study was designed to introduce SDL in physiology to phase 1 undergraduate medical students and assess its effectiveness through student and faculty perceptions. Methods: The project commenced after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethics committee. The faculty members and students were sensitized on SDL. A feedback questionnaire was framed and the topics for SDL were selected. SDL was implemented for six topics. The effectiveness of the sessions was evaluated by administering the feedback questionnaire to the students and recording perceptions of the students and faculty on SDL. The data were subjected to quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results: A total of 96 phase 1 students participated in the study. A majority of the students felt that after SDL sessions, they were more prepared and aware of their learning strengths and had started taking ownership of their learning. However, some students felt that the activity was not useful in improving their analytical skills. Both the students and the faculty were fairly satisfied with this teaching learning innovation. Conclusions: SDL was successfully implemented for phase 1 medical students. Both the students and faculty were satisfied with the SDL strategy. SDL has been shown to make students independent learners who are aware of their learning goals and capable of evaluating their learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.