Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035529›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

An Assessment of Essential Anatomy Course Content in an Entry-Level Doctor of Physical Therapy Program.

Michael A Pascoe, Mary Jane Rapport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael A PascoePhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0281-8167
Mary Jane RapportPhysical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomical knowledge is the foundation of the educational curricula in most healthcare programs. The varying scopes of practice between healthcare professions require anatomy educators to determine what content is essential to cover in a finite time with learners. When possible, the anatomy educator bases this decision on clinical experiences; this is a more significant challenge for the non-clinician educator teaching in a health profession curriculum. Although studies have determined essential anatomy content in many healthcare professions, no study has been undertaken in physical therapist education. This study was designed to determine what anatomical concepts are considered essential in physical therapist education in one doctor of physical therapy program. Faculty ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01574-1.

Indexed as

Content consensusContent validityEntry-level practiceGross anatomyStakeholder survey

Identifiers

PMID36035529
PMCPMC9411453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.