Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035491›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2022

Transvenous lead extraction in conduction system pacing.

Nadeev Wijesuriya, Mark K Elliott, Vishal Mehta, Jonathan M Behar, Steven Niederer, Bruce L Wilkoff, Christopher A Rinaldi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Controversy: in heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, conduction system pacing can be a valid alternative to biventricular pacing-pro and contra.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Extraction of lumenless pacing leads from the His bundle and left bundle branch area: outcomes of the high-volume centre.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Computational Modelling Enabling In Silico Trials for Cardiac Physiologic Pacing.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transvenous lead extraction of lumenless 3830 pacing lead in conduction system pacing: a single-center experience.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadeev WijesuriyaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark K ElliottSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vishal MehtaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan M BeharSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Steven NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bruce L WilkoffCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Christopher A RinaldiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/CRTF/22/24362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conduction System Pacing (CSP) delivered by His Bundle Pacing (HBP) or Left Bundle Pacing (LBP) are exciting novel interventions in the field of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). As the evidence base for CSP grows, the volume of implants worldwide is projected to rise significantly in the coming years. As such, physicians will be confronted with increasingly prevalent and vital issues arising in long-term follow up, including the management of infected, malfunctioning, or redundant CSP leads. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the first-line option for removal of pacing leads when indicated in these circumstances. The evidence base for TLE in the context of CSP is still in its infancy. In this article, we first provide a brief overview of TLE. We then examine the data on the long-term performance of HBP leads. Next, we describe the features of the Medtronic Select Secure 3,830 lead, and how experience of TLE of this lead in the paediatric population has informed our practice. Finally, we review the current evidence for TLE in HBP and LBP, and discuss how future studies can address gaps in our current knowledge.

Indexed as

conduction system pacingCRThis bundle pacingleft bundle area pacingtransvenous lead extraction

Identifiers

PMID36035491
PMCPMC9410714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.