ReviewFrontiers in physiology2022
Transvenous lead extraction in conduction system pacing.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Controversy: in heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, conduction system pacing can be a valid alternative to biventricular pacing-pro and contra.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- An Enhanced Method for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Extraction Using Continuous Femoral Pigtail Countertraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Transvenous extraction of a left bundle branch area pacing lead and an attempt to reimplant it: A case report.HeartRhythm case reports · 2024Article
- Extraction of lumenless pacing leads from the His bundle and left bundle branch area: outcomes of the high-volume centre.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Conduction System Pacing: Hope, Challenges, and the Journey Forward.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Computational Modelling Enabling In Silico Trials for Cardiac Physiologic Pacing.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2024Review
- Article
- Case Report: Extraction of a stylet-driven lead for left bundle branch area pacing >2 years after implantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Transvenous lead extraction of lumenless 3830 pacing lead in conduction system pacing: a single-center experience.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Article
- Advances in cardiac pacing with leadless pacemakers and conduction system pacing.Current opinion in cardiology · 2024Review
- Practical Considerations for Cardiac Electronic Devices Reimplantation Following Transvenous Lead Extraction Due to Related Endocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Conduction system pacing in pediatric and congenital heart disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conduction System Pacing (CSP) delivered by His Bundle Pacing (HBP) or Left Bundle Pacing (LBP) are exciting novel interventions in the field of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). As the evidence base for CSP grows, the volume of implants worldwide is projected to rise significantly in the coming years. As such, physicians will be confronted with increasingly prevalent and vital issues arising in long-term follow up, including the management of infected, malfunctioning, or redundant CSP leads. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the first-line option for removal of pacing leads when indicated in these circumstances. The evidence base for TLE in the context of CSP is still in its infancy. In this article, we first provide a brief overview of TLE. We then examine the data on the long-term performance of HBP leads. Next, we describe the features of the Medtronic Select Secure 3,830 lead, and how experience of TLE of this lead in the paediatric population has informed our practice. Finally, we review the current evidence for TLE in HBP and LBP, and discuss how future studies can address gaps in our current knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.