Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035418›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Use of

Jeeranan Tanwettiyanont, Napacha Piriyachananusorn, Lilit Sangsoi, Benjawan Boonsong, Chamlong Sunpapoa, Patcharawan Tanamatayarat, Nat Na-Ek, Sukrit Kanchanasurakit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficacy of Kan JangPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Efficacy of Kan JangPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeeranan TanwettiyanontDivision of Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Care, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Napacha PiriyachananusornDivision of Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Phrae Hospital, Phrae, Thailand.
Lilit SangsoiDivision of Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Phrae Hospital, Phrae, Thailand.
Benjawan BoonsongDivision of Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Phrae Hospital, Phrae, Thailand.
Chamlong SunpapoaDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Nurse, Phrae Hospital, Phrae, Thailand.
Patcharawan TanamatayaratDivision of Pharmacy and Technology, Department of Pharmaceutical Care, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Nat Na-EkPharmacoepidemiology, Social and Administrative Pharmacy (P-SAP) Research Unit, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.
Sukrit KanchanasurakitDivision of Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Care, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Materials and methods: We collected data between March 2020 and August 2021 from COVID-19 patients admitted to one hospital in Thailand. Patients whose infection was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction, had normal chest radiography and did not receive favipiravir at admission were included and categorised as either AP (deriving from a dried and ground aerial part of the plant), given as capsules with a total daily dose of 180 mg andrographolide for 5 days or standard of care. They were followed for pneumonia confirmed by chest radiography. Multiple logistic regression was used for the analysis controlling for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, statin use, and antihypertensive drug use. Results: A total of 605 out of 1,054 patients (mostly unvaccinated) were included in the analysis. Of these, 59 patients (9.8%) developed pneumonia during the median follow-up of 7 days. The incidence rates of pneumonia were 13.93 (95% CI 10.09, 19.23) and 12.47 (95% CI 8.21, 18.94) per 1,000 person-days in the AP and standard of care groups, respectively. Compared to the standard of care group, the odds ratios of having pneumonia in the AP group were 1.24 (95% CI 0.71, 2.16; unadjusted model) and 1.42 (95% CI 0.79, 2.55; fully adjusted model). All sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main results. Conclusion: The use of AP was not significantly associated with a decreased risk of pneumonia in mild COVID-19 patients. While waiting for insights from ongoing trials, AP's use in COVID-19 should be done with caution.

Indexed as

Andrographis paniculataandrographolideCOVID-19hospitalisationpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID36035418
PMCPMC9399469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.