Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035342›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2022

Current strategies to diagnose and manage positive surgical margins and local recurrence after partial nephrectomy.

Umberto Carbonara, Daniele Amparore, Cosimo Gentile, Riccardo Bertolo, Selcuk Erdem, Alexandre Ingels, Michele Marchioni, Constantijn H J Muselaers, Onder Kara, Laura Marandino and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Feasibility and Safety of Repeat Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Ipsilateral Local Recurrence: A Case Series.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The outcomes of partial nephrectomy - considerations that contribute to positive surgical margins.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Umberto CarbonaraEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Daniele AmparoreEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Cosimo GentileDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Riccardo BertoloEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Selcuk ErdemEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Alexandre IngelsEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Michele MarchioniEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Constantijn H J MuselaersEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Onder KaraEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Laura MarandinoEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Nicola PavanEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Eduard RousselEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Angela PecoraroEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Fabio CrocerossaDepartment of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giuseppe TorreDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Riccardo CampiEuropean Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Renal Cancer Working Group.
Pasquale DitonnoDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: No standard strategy for diagnosis and management of positive surgical margin (PSM) and local recurrence after partial nephrectomy (PN) are reported in literature. This review aims to provide an overview of the current strategies and further perspectives on this patient setting. Methods: A non-systematic review of the literature was completed. The research included the most updated articles (about the last 10 years). Results: Techniques for diagnosing PSMs during PN include intraoperative frozen section, imprinting cytology, and other specific tools. No clear evidence is reported about these methods. Regarding PSM management, active surveillance with a combination of imaging and laboratory evaluation is the first option line followed by surgery. Regarding local recurrence management, surgery is the primary curative approach when possible but it may be technically difficult due to anatomy resultant from previous PN. In this scenario, thermal ablation (TA) may have the potential to circumvent these limitations representing a less invasive alternative. Salvage surgery represents a valid option; six studies analyzed the outcomes of nephrectomy on local recurrence after PN with three of these focused on robotic approach. Overall, complication rates of salvage surgery are higher compared to TA but ablation presents a higher recurrence rate up to 25% of cases that can often be managed with repeat ablation. Conclusion: Controversy still exists surrounding the best strategy for management and diagnosis of patients with PSMs or local recurrence after PN. Active surveillance is likely to be the optimal first-line management option for most patients with PSMs. Ablation and salvage surgery both represent valid options in patients with local recurrence after PN. Conversely, salvage PN and radical nephrectomy have fewer recurrences but are associated with a higher complication rate compared to TA. In this scenario, robotic surgery plays an important role in improving salvage PN and radical nephrectomy outcomes.

Indexed as

Local recurrencePartial nephrectomyPositive surgical marginRadical nephrectomyRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID36035342
PMCPMC9399527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.