Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035341›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2022

Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond.

Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Luisa Egen, Chanel E Fischetti, Stefano Puliatti, Gomez Rivas Juan, Mark Taratkin, Rivero Belenchon Ines, Marie Angela Sidoti Abate, Julia Mühlbauer, Frederik Wessels and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The Use of Radiomic Tools in Renal Mass Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Karl-Friedrich KowalewskiDepartment of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Luisa EgenDepartment of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Chanel E FischettiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Stefano PuliattiUrology Department, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Gomez Rivas JuanDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Mark TaratkinInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Rivero Belenchon InesUrology and Nephrology Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Manuel Siurot s/n, Seville, Spain.
Marie Angela Sidoti AbateDepartment of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Julia MühlbauerDepartment of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Frederik WesselsDepartment of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Enrico CheccucciDepartment of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni CacciamaniUSC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Young Academic Urologists (YAU)-Urotechnology-Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has made considerable progress within the last decade and is the subject of contemporary literature. This trend is driven by improved computational abilities and increasing amounts of complex data that allow for new approaches in analysis and interpretation. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a rising incidence since most tumors are now detected at an earlier stage due to improved imaging. This creates considerable challenges as approximately 10%-17% of kidney tumors are designated as benign in histopathological evaluation; however, certain co-morbid populations (the obese and elderly) have an increased peri-interventional risk. AI offers an alternative solution by helping to optimize precision and guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. The narrative review introduced basic principles and provide a comprehensive overview of current AI techniques for RCC. Currently, AI applications can be found in any aspect of RCC management including diagnostics, perioperative care, pathology, and follow-up. Most commonly applied models include neural networks, random forest, support vector machines, and regression. However, for implementation in daily practice, health care providers need to develop a basic understanding and establish interdisciplinary collaborations in order to standardize datasets, define meaningful endpoints, and unify interpretation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceImagingKidney cancerMachine learningTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36035341
PMCPMC9399557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.